Enhancing corneal ectasia susceptibility detection: analysis of a new algorithm (BAD-D v4)

Abstract Accurate detection of post-refractive ectasia susceptibility is essential during preoperative evaluation for laser vision correction (LVC) due to the risk of progressive corneal ectasia and vision decline post-surgery. Despite improved screening and a reduced incidence from 0.66 to 0.033%, iatrogenic ectasia remains a concern due to the severe vision loss it can cause, highlighting the need for more accurate detection tools. A new optimized version of the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display version 4 (BAD-D v4) was developed and validated across 26 international centers to enhance the detection of keratoconus and very asymmetric ectasia and to assess the risk of post-refractive ectasia. Analyzing a dataset of 3,886 eyes from 3,351 patients, including normal, keratoconus (KC), and cases with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) categories, having one eye with normal topography (VAE-NT and the fellow eye with clinical ectasia (VAE-E). The study utilized an optimized logistic regression algorithm improving diagnostic accuracy. The BAD-D v4 showed superior efficacy in differentiating normal eyes from ectatic conditions, with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) scores of 0.997 and 0.998 in training and testing samples for normal versus clinical ectasia. Additionally, in Normal vs. Disease (KC + VAE), the AUROC was 0.974 and 0.966, and in the challenging Normal vs. VAE-NT diverse group, it scored 0.905 and 0.858. These results outperformed the current version (BAD-D v3) and were comparable to the Pentacam Random Forest Index in all tested scenarios, highlighting the potential of BAD-D v4 in early ectasia detection, without altering the index scale or the end-user experience.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81809-w
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing corneal ectasia susceptibility detection: analysis of a new algorithm (BAD-D v4)

María A. Henríquez, Thomas Kohnen, Bernardo T. Lopes, Renato Ambrósio et al.
5 citations
Scientific Reports
Corneal surgery and disorders
2.02
article

Enhancing corneal ectasia susceptibility detection: analysis of a new algorithm (BAD-D v4)

María A. Henríquez, Thomas Kohnen, Bernardo T. Lopes, Renato Ambrósio, Luis Izquierdo, Michael W. Belin
article en
5 citations

Abstract

Abstract Accurate detection of post-refractive ectasia susceptibility is essential during preoperative evaluation for laser vision correction (LVC) due to the risk of progressive corneal ectasia and vision decline post-surgery. Despite improved screening and a reduced incidence from 0.66 to 0.033%, iatrogenic ectasia remains a concern due to the severe vision loss it can cause, highlighting the need for more accurate detection tools. A new optimized version of the Belin/Ambrósio Enhanced Ectasia Display version 4 (BAD-D v4) was developed and validated across 26 international centers to enhance the detection of keratoconus and very asymmetric ectasia and to assess the risk of post-refractive ectasia. Analyzing a dataset of 3,886 eyes from 3,351 patients, including normal, keratoconus (KC), and cases with very asymmetric ectasia (VAE) categories, having one eye with normal topography (VAE-NT and the fellow eye with clinical ectasia (VAE-E). The study utilized an optimized logistic regression algorithm improving diagnostic accuracy. The BAD-D v4 showed superior efficacy in differentiating normal eyes from ectatic conditions, with Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUROC) scores of 0.997 and 0.998 in training and testing samples for normal versus clinical ectasia. Additionally, in Normal vs. Disease (KC + VAE), the AUROC was 0.974 and 0.966, and in the challenging Normal vs. VAE-NT diverse group, it scored 0.905 and 0.858. These results outperformed the current version (BAD-D v3) and were comparable to the Pentacam Random Forest Index in all tested scenarios, highlighting the potential of BAD-D v4 in early ectasia detection, without altering the index scale or the end-user experience.

Scientific ReportsVol. 14(1)
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE), University of Arizona (US), National University of San Marcos (PE), Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Universidad Ricardo Palma (PE), Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro (BR), Universidade Federal de São Paulo (BR)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Corneal surgery and disorders
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.