How Do Driving Factors Affect the Ecological Restoration Degree in Different Basins? A Case Study of Six River Basins in Yunnan, China

Ecological space provides human beings with the material resources and living environment needed for life; it is the basis for human survival and development, and ecological restoration is directly related to the sustainable development of human society. As an important ecological security barrier in China, the ecological restoration of the six river basins in Yunnan Province directly affects the ecological security of surrounding provinces and neighboring countries. At present, there is still a lack of research on the differences in ecological restoration between river basins. Therefore, we assessed the spatiotemporal differences in ecological restoration degree in terms of ecosystem patterns, ecosystem quality, and ecosystem services in Yunnan Province from 2000 to 2019 and explored their influencing factors in the six river basins. The results showed the following: ① The six river basins differed in terms of changes in ecosystem patterns over the 20-year period, with the share of settlement ecosystems increasing in the six river basins. The most pronounced changes in ecosystem patterns occurred in the Nu River Basin. There were also differences in the ecosystem transformation priorities of the six river basins. In addition to this, among the four selected indicators, fractional vegetation cover, net primary productivity, and soil conservation increased, but water retention exhibited a stable deteriorating trend. ② Yunnan Province’s ecological restoration degree as a whole is in a relatively stable state. There is no significant improvement or significant deterioration in the region. The best ecological restoration degree of the six river basins is the Pearl River Basin, with a trend of gradual stabilization improvement, and the worst is the Nu River Basin, with a state of gradual stabilization deterioration. ③ The factors that most influence the Ecological Restoration Index (ERI) of the six river basins are mean annual precipitation change rate, mean annual precipitation, annual mean temperature, ecological engineering, and border index. The precipitation change rate was the most important factor influencing ecological restoration in the six river basins, while the border index was the most important factor influencing the differences in ERI in the six river basins. In the future, ecological restoration measures in the six river basins of Yunnan Province should take into account regional differences, strengthen governmental supervision, and emphasize the impact of border factors on neighboring river basins to promote a balanced degree of ecological restoration in Yunnan Province as a whole.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Land
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13122091
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Do Driving Factors Affect the Ecological Restoration Degree in Different Basins? A Case Study of Six River Basins in Yunnan, China

W. B. Qian, Ning Jia
3 citations
Land
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.85
article

How Do Driving Factors Affect the Ecological Restoration Degree in Different Basins? A Case Study of Six River Basins in Yunnan, China

W. B. Qian, Ning Jia
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Ecological space provides human beings with the material resources and living environment needed for life; it is the basis for human survival and development, and ecological restoration is directly related to the sustainable development of human society. As an important ecological security barrier in China, the ecological restoration of the six river basins in Yunnan Province directly affects the ecological security of surrounding provinces and neighboring countries. At present, there is still a lack of research on the differences in ecological restoration between river basins. Therefore, we assessed the spatiotemporal differences in ecological restoration degree in terms of ecosystem patterns, ecosystem quality, and ecosystem services in Yunnan Province from 2000 to 2019 and explored their influencing factors in the six river basins. The results showed the following: ① The six river basins differed in terms of changes in ecosystem patterns over the 20-year period, with the share of settlement ecosystems increasing in the six river basins. The most pronounced changes in ecosystem patterns occurred in the Nu River Basin. There were also differences in the ecosystem transformation priorities of the six river basins. In addition to this, among the four selected indicators, fractional vegetation cover, net primary productivity, and soil conservation increased, but water retention exhibited a stable deteriorating trend. ② Yunnan Province’s ecological restoration degree as a whole is in a relatively stable state. There is no significant improvement or significant deterioration in the region. The best ecological restoration degree of the six river basins is the Pearl River Basin, with a trend of gradual stabilization improvement, and the worst is the Nu River Basin, with a state of gradual stabilization deterioration. ③ The factors that most influence the Ecological Restoration Index (ERI) of the six river basins are mean annual precipitation change rate, mean annual precipitation, annual mean temperature, ecological engineering, and border index. The precipitation change rate was the most important factor influencing ecological restoration in the six river basins, while the border index was the most important factor influencing the differences in ERI in the six river basins. In the future, ecological restoration measures in the six river basins of Yunnan Province should take into account regional differences, strengthen governmental supervision, and emphasize the impact of border factors on neighboring river basins to promote a balanced degree of ecological restoration in Yunnan Province as a whole.

LandVol. 13(12)
Henan University (CN), Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research (CN)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.