Why does the brain matter for education?

We argue that a focus on the brain matters for teachers because it increases understanding of how learning works and the factors that influence learning outcomes and student well-being without being reductionist. Constraints on learning that arise from biology sometimes seem arbitrary outside a neuroscience framework (several examples are provided). A neuroscience perspective encourages a more holistic and developmental view of learning than a narrow cognitive (memory) oriented approach. Because educational neuroscience is an inherently translational field that relies on dialogues between researchers and practitioners, we argue it is important to understand how teachers view the field and how insights from the science of learning might usefully feed into their practice. We then assess the insights, strengths and limitations of the four papers, as well as the potential that their respective lines of work offer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12727
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.06
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Why does the brain matter for education?

Michael S. C. Thomas, Y. Arslan
6 citations
British Journal of Educational Psychology
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
2.06
article

Why does the brain matter for education?

Michael S. C. Thomas, Y. Arslan
article en
6 citations

Abstract

We argue that a focus on the brain matters for teachers because it increases understanding of how learning works and the factors that influence learning outcomes and student well-being without being reductionist. Constraints on learning that arise from biology sometimes seem arbitrary outside a neuroscience framework (several examples are provided). A neuroscience perspective encourages a more holistic and developmental view of learning than a narrow cognitive (memory) oriented approach. Because educational neuroscience is an inherently translational field that relies on dialogues between researchers and practitioners, we argue it is important to understand how teachers view the field and how insights from the science of learning might usefully feed into their practice. We then assess the insights, strengths and limitations of the four papers, as well as the potential that their respective lines of work offer.

British Journal of Educational PsychologyVol. 95(2)
University of London (GB), University College London (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
2.06
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Why does the brain matter for education? — Michael S. C. Thomas, Y. Arslan · British Journal of Educational Psychology (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS