Field Trials of Wild Entomopathogenic Fungi and Commercial Steinernema carpocapsae on the Large Pine Weevil (Hylobius abietis [L.]) Including an Assessment of Non-Target Effects

The large pine weevil (<i>Hylobius abietis</i> L.) is a major pest in European and Asian coniferous forests, particularly in managed plantations where clear-felling practices create ideal conditions for its population growth. Traditional management practices involving synthetic insecticides have limited efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations and pose environmental risks. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a wild entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) and the commercial entomopathogenic nematode <i>Steinernema carpocapsae</i> (EPN) as biological control agents (BCAs) against <i>H. abietis</i> in clear-felled spruce plantations in Wales and Scotland. Field trials used a randomised block design with three treatments (EPN full dose, EPF full dose and a combination of EPF+EPN at half doses each) compared to a control. Emergence trapping and destructive sampling were employed to assess treatment efficacy. All treatments significantly reduced weevil emergence, with the mixed treatment showing the greatest impact. Destructive sampling revealed strong associations between treatment type and infection outcomes in <i>H. abietis</i>, with a small but significant relationship between weevil developmental stages and infection types. Importantly, the treatments had no significant impact on the total abundance or taxon richness of non-target invertebrates. These findings suggest that wild EPFs alone and combined with EPNs are effective and environmentally safe alternatives to synthetic insecticides for managing <i>H. abietis</i> populations in managed forests.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Insects
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15120967
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Field Trials of Wild Entomopathogenic Fungi and Commercial Steinernema carpocapsae on the Large Pine Weevil (Hylobius abietis [L.]) Including an Assessment of Non-Target Effects

Luis M. Quinzo-Ortega, Robbie Rae, William T. Swaney, R. W. Moore et al.
1 citations
Insects
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
0.54
article

Field Trials of Wild Entomopathogenic Fungi and Commercial Steinernema carpocapsae on the Large Pine Weevil (Hylobius abietis [L.]) Including an Assessment of Non-Target Effects

Luis M. Quinzo-Ortega, Robbie Rae, William T. Swaney, R. W. Moore, Christopher D. Williams
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The large pine weevil (<i>Hylobius abietis</i> L.) is a major pest in European and Asian coniferous forests, particularly in managed plantations where clear-felling practices create ideal conditions for its population growth. Traditional management practices involving synthetic insecticides have limited efficacy in terms of reducing pest populations and pose environmental risks. This study evaluated the effectiveness of a wild entomopathogenic fungus (EPF) and the commercial entomopathogenic nematode <i>Steinernema carpocapsae</i> (EPN) as biological control agents (BCAs) against <i>H. abietis</i> in clear-felled spruce plantations in Wales and Scotland. Field trials used a randomised block design with three treatments (EPN full dose, EPF full dose and a combination of EPF+EPN at half doses each) compared to a control. Emergence trapping and destructive sampling were employed to assess treatment efficacy. All treatments significantly reduced weevil emergence, with the mixed treatment showing the greatest impact. Destructive sampling revealed strong associations between treatment type and infection outcomes in <i>H. abietis</i>, with a small but significant relationship between weevil developmental stages and infection types. Importantly, the treatments had no significant impact on the total abundance or taxon richness of non-target invertebrates. These findings suggest that wild EPFs alone and combined with EPNs are effective and environmentally safe alternatives to synthetic insecticides for managing <i>H. abietis</i> populations in managed forests.

InsectsVol. 15(12)
Forest Research (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Liverpool John Moores University
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Entomopathogenic Microorganisms in Pest Control
0.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.