Management of the governance and social aspects of <scp>ESG</scp> in the financial industry

Abstract This study investigates how banks adjusted their ESG strategies in response to the heightened governance requirements of the 2010 Dodd‐Frank Act. The findings reveal that banks, particularly those with lower operating performance and higher institutional investor ownership, responded by significantly increasing their focus on governance while reducing efforts in social initiatives. In contrast, non‐bank financial institutions, including shadow banks, exhibited simultaneous improvements in both governance and social performances during the same period. This shift in bank ESG management underscores the trade‐offs involved in regulatory compliance, where focusing on a single ESG pillar, such as governance, may unintentionally detract from other pillars like social. Policy‐makers and regulators should adopt a more balanced approach to ensure that all ESG pillars receive adequate attention for long‐term corporate sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Review of Financial Economics
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/rfe.1222
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.55
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Management of the governance and social aspects of ESG in the financial industry

An Yan, Jie Jiao
1 citations
Review of Financial Economics
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
0.55
article

Management of the governance and social aspects of ESG in the financial industry

An Yan, Jie Jiao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study investigates how banks adjusted their ESG strategies in response to the heightened governance requirements of the 2010 Dodd‐Frank Act. The findings reveal that banks, particularly those with lower operating performance and higher institutional investor ownership, responded by significantly increasing their focus on governance while reducing efforts in social initiatives. In contrast, non‐bank financial institutions, including shadow banks, exhibited simultaneous improvements in both governance and social performances during the same period. This shift in bank ESG management underscores the trade‐offs involved in regulatory compliance, where focusing on a single ESG pillar, such as governance, may unintentionally detract from other pillars like social. Policy‐makers and regulators should adopt a more balanced approach to ensure that all ESG pillars receive adequate attention for long‐term corporate sustainability.

Review of Financial EconomicsVol. 43(1)
Fordham University (US), Tsinghua University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
0.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.