How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6–12-year-olds

Children in the general community may have different perceptions of HRQoL when responding to the EQ-5D-Y-3L possibly due to their limited experience with health-related challenges. The retrospective think-aloud approach adopted highlighted the relatively higher prevalence of response issues in the younger children (ages < 11 years), indicating the need for careful interpretation of self-reported HRQoL using the current version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L in this population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-024-02320-4
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.78

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6–12-year-olds

Jyoti Khadka, Kiri Lay, Christine Mpundu‐Kaambwa, Julie Ratcliffe et al.
6 citations
Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.78
article

How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6–12-year-olds

Jyoti Khadka, Kiri Lay, Christine Mpundu‐Kaambwa, Julie Ratcliffe, Diana Khanna
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Children in the general community may have different perceptions of HRQoL when responding to the EQ-5D-Y-3L possibly due to their limited experience with health-related challenges. The retrospective think-aloud approach adopted highlighted the relatively higher prevalence of response issues in the younger children (ages < 11 years), indicating the need for careful interpretation of self-reported HRQoL using the current version of the EQ-5D-Y-3L in this population.

Health and Quality of Life OutcomesVol. 22(1)
The University of Melbourne (AU), Flinders University (AU), Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health (AU), South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (AU)
Australian Government, Deakin University, Department of Health and Aged Care, Australian Government, Medical Research Council, National Health and Medical Research Council
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
6.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How do children understand and respond to the EQ-5D-Y-3L? A mixed methods study in a community-based sample of 6–12-year-olds — Jyoti Khadka, Kiri Lay, et al. · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS