Culpa, responsabilidade e mudanças climáticas

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the difference between guilt and responsibility, in the context of the ecological crisis, particularly after de floodings in Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and the following public shock. We begin by presenting a short historical and conceptual background, which will present a few important moments in the progressive occupation, by the ecological issues, of a central place in contemporary politics and society. In this moment of the argument, we will present Vandana Shiva’s criticism to the Modern development model, implemented throughout the world. We then turn our attention to the notion of ideology as discussed by Hannah Arendt, particularly regarding its purpose of total domination, legitimized by resorting to putative superhuman processes. In a third moment, we discuss what we called – tentatively – “generic form of the modern political subjectivity”, intending to show that it is dependent, along with the community it establishes, on the reproduction of existential crises for its preservation. Lastly, we discuss the distinction between guilt and responsibility, based on Hannah Arendt’s writings, closing the paper with brief remarks regarding an alternative form of political subjectivity, more capable of dealing with the ecological issues of our time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Opinião Filosófica
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v15n2.1219
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.42
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Culpa, responsabilidade e mudanças climáticas

Rafael Padilha, Nuno Castanheira
2 citations
Revista Opinião Filosófica
Environmental Sustainability and Education
1.42
article

Culpa, responsabilidade e mudanças climáticas

Rafael Padilha, Nuno Castanheira
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to discuss the difference between guilt and responsibility, in the context of the ecological crisis, particularly after de floodings in Rio Grande do Sul (Brazil) and the following public shock. We begin by presenting a short historical and conceptual background, which will present a few important moments in the progressive occupation, by the ecological issues, of a central place in contemporary politics and society. In this moment of the argument, we will present Vandana Shiva’s criticism to the Modern development model, implemented throughout the world. We then turn our attention to the notion of ideology as discussed by Hannah Arendt, particularly regarding its purpose of total domination, legitimized by resorting to putative superhuman processes. In a third moment, we discuss what we called – tentatively – “generic form of the modern political subjectivity”, intending to show that it is dependent, along with the community it establishes, on the reproduction of existential crises for its preservation. Lastly, we discuss the distinction between guilt and responsibility, based on Hannah Arendt’s writings, closing the paper with brief remarks regarding an alternative form of political subjectivity, more capable of dealing with the ecological issues of our time.

Revista Opinião FilosóficaVol. 15(2)
Universidade Federal de Pelotas (BR), Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (BR)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Environmental Sustainability and Education
1.42
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.