Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies

This study of PEI among well-established cohort studies underscores the importance of PEI for project sustainability and highlights key factors to consider in developing PEI. Our analysis shows that knowledge gaps exist regarding which approaches have highest impact on retention rates and are best suited for different participant groups. Research is needed to support the development of best practices for PEI as well as knowledge exchange between cohorts through network building.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-024-02419-8
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.10

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies

Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne, Shona M. Kerr, María Paz García, Robin Flaig et al.
6 citations
BMC Medical Research Methodology
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.10
article

Participant engagement and involvement in longitudinal cohort studies: qualitative insights from a selection of pregnancy and birth, twin, and family-based population cohort studies

Isabelle Budin‐Ljøsne, Shona M. Kerr, María Paz García, Robin Flaig, Aamnah Rahman, Nanna Alida Grit Fredheim, Alexandra Havdahl, Lynn Molloy, Gonneke Willemsen, Marie-Aline A Charles, Janine F. Felix, Shahid Islam, Jennifer R. Harris, Costanza Pizzi, Diane P. Wood, Inger Kristine Meder, Susan Morton, Charlotte Alison Jevne, Bojana Milanovic Kleven
article en
6 citations

Abstract

This study of PEI among well-established cohort studies underscores the importance of PEI for project sustainability and highlights key factors to consider in developing PEI. Our analysis shows that knowledge gaps exist regarding which approaches have highest impact on retention rates and are best suited for different participant groups. Research is needed to support the development of best practices for PEI as well as knowledge exchange between cohorts through network building.

BMC Medical Research MethodologyVol. 24(1)
Statens Serum Institut (DK), University of Technology Sydney (AU), Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NO), Inserm (FR), The University of Western Australia (AU), King's College London (GB), University of Oslo (NO), Høyskolen Kristiania (NO), Bradford Royal Infirmary (GB), Erasmus MC (NL), University of Bristol (GB), Lovisenberg Diakonale Høgskole (NO), Bradford Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Turin (IT), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), Medical Research Council (GB), University of Edinburgh (GB)
Medical Research Council, Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
5.10
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.