Perigos de uma Filosofia Única

The article deals with French-uspian structural historiography as an illustrative case of the dangers of a sole philosophy becoming a pedagogical program for teaching and producing philosophy. To this end, it begins by exposing the construction of the French-uspian historiographical curriculum. Next, we discuss the unilaterality of the structural method, since it encompasses the conception that all philosophies have a sole logic, the systemic one, even if a philosopher refuses to present an architecture of reasons. Finally, the production of the “system of inhibitions” is explained, summarized in the banishment of controversy and programmed alienation, as a domestication of thought, masked under the veil of modernizing exegetical techniques. The objective of the article is to show that one of the Brazilian philosophical problems is the coloniality of philosophical production, marked less by the philosophy of the structural method and more by the inhibiting intellectual and pedagogical dispositions that it favored. This disposition can be produced by other pedagogies based on unilateral philosophies. Hence the importance of considering the French-uspian case to encourage a review of the regional formations of the teaching and study of philosophy in Brazil and, thus, combat the forces of domestication of philosophy among us.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Revista Opinião Filosófica
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36592/opiniaofilosofica.v15n2.1112
Primary Topic
Philosophy and Historical Thought
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perigos de uma Filosofia Única

Hailton Felipe Guiomarino
Revista Opinião Filosófica
Philosophy and Historical Thought
article

Perigos de uma Filosofia Única

Hailton Felipe Guiomarino
article en

Abstract

The article deals with French-uspian structural historiography as an illustrative case of the dangers of a sole philosophy becoming a pedagogical program for teaching and producing philosophy. To this end, it begins by exposing the construction of the French-uspian historiographical curriculum. Next, we discuss the unilaterality of the structural method, since it encompasses the conception that all philosophies have a sole logic, the systemic one, even if a philosopher refuses to present an architecture of reasons. Finally, the production of the “system of inhibitions” is explained, summarized in the banishment of controversy and programmed alienation, as a domestication of thought, masked under the veil of modernizing exegetical techniques. The objective of the article is to show that one of the Brazilian philosophical problems is the coloniality of philosophical production, marked less by the philosophy of the structural method and more by the inhibiting intellectual and pedagogical dispositions that it favored. This disposition can be produced by other pedagogies based on unilateral philosophies. Hence the importance of considering the French-uspian case to encourage a review of the regional formations of the teaching and study of philosophy in Brazil and, thus, combat the forces of domestication of philosophy among us.

Revista Opinião FilosóficaVol. 15(2)
Universidade Federal do Pará (BR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Philosophy and Historical Thought
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perigos de uma Filosofia Única — Hailton Felipe Guiomarino · Revista Opinião Filosófica (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS