“Feeling their way through their cultural roots”: theorising the Khoisan revivalist critique of authenticity from below

Authenticity is a longstanding concern in Khoisan Studies. Most scholarship has examined how stereotypical, essentialist and static notions of “authentic” Khoisan identity and culture are habitually reproduced and demanded of the Khoisan for economic or political gain. Recent work instead emphasises agency, hybridity and dynamism, and increasingly draws attention to interlocutors’ own views on authenticity. I make a contribution to this literature by drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Cape Town between 2014 and 2022 among “Khoisan revivalists”, whose authenticity as urban-based and newly identifying indigenous people rarely goes unquestioned. My non-exhaustive examples of Khoisan revivalist aesthetics demonstrate the intermittent rejection, reinforcement and ignoring of dominant representations and notions of accuracy in pursuit of authenticity. This critique of authenticity sheds new light on how indigenous peoples reclaim their heritage. In addition, as an example of theorising from below, it prompts consideration of the politics of anthropological writing on the subject.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Anthropology Southern Africa
Published
2024-11-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/23323256.2024.2367229
Primary Topic
Cultural Identity and Heritage
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Feeling their way through their cultural roots”: theorising the Khoisan revivalist critique of authenticity from below

Rafaël Verbuyst
Anthropology Southern Africa
Cultural Identity and Heritage
article

“Feeling their way through their cultural roots”: theorising the Khoisan revivalist critique of authenticity from below

Rafaël Verbuyst
article en

Abstract

Authenticity is a longstanding concern in Khoisan Studies. Most scholarship has examined how stereotypical, essentialist and static notions of “authentic” Khoisan identity and culture are habitually reproduced and demanded of the Khoisan for economic or political gain. Recent work instead emphasises agency, hybridity and dynamism, and increasingly draws attention to interlocutors’ own views on authenticity. I make a contribution to this literature by drawing on ethnographic fieldwork conducted in Cape Town between 2014 and 2022 among “Khoisan revivalists”, whose authenticity as urban-based and newly identifying indigenous people rarely goes unquestioned. My non-exhaustive examples of Khoisan revivalist aesthetics demonstrate the intermittent rejection, reinforcement and ignoring of dominant representations and notions of accuracy in pursuit of authenticity. This critique of authenticity sheds new light on how indigenous peoples reclaim their heritage. In addition, as an example of theorising from below, it prompts consideration of the politics of anthropological writing on the subject.

Anthropology Southern AfricaVol. 47(3)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), Ghent University (BE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Cultural Identity and Heritage
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.