Air quality assessment of dissecting a J750 three-dimensional printed temporal bone and recommendations 2024

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a method that is used to create models for the use of simulated temporal bone dissection and has increasing availability in biomedical departments. The advantages of 3D printing are cheaper cost, transportability, readily accessible dissection with minimal preparation and reduced ethical restrictions in comparison to the use of cadaveric specimens. A high standard of likeness to cadaveric anatomy is seen with the use of a multi-material jet printer which can account for the variation in qualities of the hard bone and soft tissue structures within the middle ear and temporal bone. There remains a concern that the heat of drilling the materials may create harmful exposure of inhalable fumes and aerosols including volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the air quality proximal to the dissector of 3D printed materials which are currently commonly used for printing temporal bones and provide a recommendation for dissecting these materials. Methods: An occupational safety assessment was performed in a simulated temporal bone laboratory with four different printed materials cited in the literature (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polylactic acid, white resin, multi-material). These were used to print temporal bone models with three different 3D printing processes (fused filament fabrication, multi-material jetting, stereolithography). An otolaryngology/head and neck surgical registrar conducted a temporal bone dissection on the models while wearing air quality sampling badges to determine the aerosol exposure by measuring the VOCs and total inhalable particles and respirable particles in the air proximal to the dissector. Results: The results of the samples from the badges revealed that the individual VOC samples and particulate counts (respirable and inhalable particles) were well below the maximum limit recommended concentrations [Safe Work Australia (SWA) and Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists (AIOH)]. Conclusions: The study findings reveal that dissection of 3D printed temporal bones, in particular the multi-material Stratasys J750 printed models, can be dissected within the safe limits of AIOH and SWA standards to inhalable, respirable particles and individually tested VOCs. However, our recommendations include the use of personal protective equipment, local extraction, and ventilation within the room.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Australian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21037/ajo-24-25
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Air quality assessment of dissecting a J750 three-dimensional printed temporal bone and recommendations 2024

David P. Forrestal, Michael Wagels, Joan Bowman, Roozbeh Fakhr et al.
1 citations
Australian Journal of Otolaryngology
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
0.57
article

Air quality assessment of dissecting a J750 three-dimensional printed temporal bone and recommendations 2024

David P. Forrestal, Michael Wagels, Joan Bowman, Roozbeh Fakhr, Emma Kanaganayagam, Jean-Michel Bourque
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Background: Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a method that is used to create models for the use of simulated temporal bone dissection and has increasing availability in biomedical departments. The advantages of 3D printing are cheaper cost, transportability, readily accessible dissection with minimal preparation and reduced ethical restrictions in comparison to the use of cadaveric specimens. A high standard of likeness to cadaveric anatomy is seen with the use of a multi-material jet printer which can account for the variation in qualities of the hard bone and soft tissue structures within the middle ear and temporal bone. There remains a concern that the heat of drilling the materials may create harmful exposure of inhalable fumes and aerosols including volatile organic compounds (VOCs). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the air quality proximal to the dissector of 3D printed materials which are currently commonly used for printing temporal bones and provide a recommendation for dissecting these materials. Methods: An occupational safety assessment was performed in a simulated temporal bone laboratory with four different printed materials cited in the literature (acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polylactic acid, white resin, multi-material). These were used to print temporal bone models with three different 3D printing processes (fused filament fabrication, multi-material jetting, stereolithography). An otolaryngology/head and neck surgical registrar conducted a temporal bone dissection on the models while wearing air quality sampling badges to determine the aerosol exposure by measuring the VOCs and total inhalable particles and respirable particles in the air proximal to the dissector. Results: The results of the samples from the badges revealed that the individual VOC samples and particulate counts (respirable and inhalable particles) were well below the maximum limit recommended concentrations [Safe Work Australia (SWA) and Australian Institute of Occupational Hygienists (AIOH)]. Conclusions: The study findings reveal that dissection of 3D printed temporal bones, in particular the multi-material Stratasys J750 printed models, can be dissected within the safe limits of AIOH and SWA standards to inhalable, respirable particles and individually tested VOCs. However, our recommendations include the use of personal protective equipment, local extraction, and ventilation within the room.

Australian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 8
Queensland Health (AU), Mater Health Services (AU), The University of Queensland (AU), Greenslopes Private Hospital (AU), Princess Alexandra Hospital (AU), Mater Adult Hospital (AU), Université Laval (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.