Evidence is not enough: health technology reassessment to de-implement low-value care

Evidence is not enough to achieve de-implementation of LVC. This has made health technology assessment agencies and health care organizations widen the scope of HTR to encompass strategies to facilitate de-implementation, including involving key stakeholders in the HTR process and taking actions to support de-implementation. Despite these efforts, there can still be resistance to de-implementation of LVC in passive forms, involving continued use of the practice and more active resistance such as continued funding and opinion-making opposing de-implementation. Knowledge from implementation and de-implementation research can offer guidance in how to support the execution phase of HTR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12961-024-01249-w
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.55

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence is not enough: health technology reassessment to de-implement low-value care

Henna Hasson, Hanna Augustsson, Per Nilsén, Marta Roczniewska et al.
3 citations
Health Research Policy and Systems
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.55
article

Evidence is not enough: health technology reassessment to de-implement low-value care

Henna Hasson, Hanna Augustsson, Per Nilsén, Marta Roczniewska, Sara Ingvarsson, Ulrica von Thiele Schwarz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Evidence is not enough to achieve de-implementation of LVC. This has made health technology assessment agencies and health care organizations widen the scope of HTR to encompass strategies to facilitate de-implementation, including involving key stakeholders in the HTR process and taking actions to support de-implementation. Despite these efforts, there can still be resistance to de-implementation of LVC in passive forms, involving continued use of the practice and more active resistance such as continued funding and opinion-making opposing de-implementation. Knowledge from implementation and de-implementation research can offer guidance in how to support the execution phase of HTR.

Health Research Policy and SystemsVol. 22(1)
Linköping University (SE), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Centre for Palaeogenetics (SE), Mälardalen University (SE)
Karolinska Institutet, Vetenskapsrådet, Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Healthcare cost, quality, practices
2.55
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.