Mobile learning in the classroom – Should students bring mobile devices for learning, or should these be provided by schools?

Abstract In recent years, the importance of mobile devices has increased for education in general and more specifically for science and mathematics education. In the classroom, approaches for teaching with mobile devices include using student-owned devices (“bring your own device”; BYOD approach) or using school-owned devices from central pools (POOL approach). While many studies point out features of mobile learning and BYOD that are conducive to learning, a research gap can be identified in the analysis of effects of mobile device access concepts on teaching–learning processes. Thus, this study aimed to empirically compare BYOD and POOL approaches in terms of learning performance and cognitive performance (subject knowledge development, cognitive load, concentration performance). Furthermore, the analyses included specific characteristics and preconditions (gender, socioeconomic status, fear of missing out, problematic smartphone use). A quasi-experimental study (two groups) was conducted in year 8 and 9 physics classes ( N = 339 students) in which smartphones are used for different purposes. The present data show no group differences between the BYOD and the POOL approach in the group of learners with respect to subject knowledge development, cognitive load, and concentration performance. However, individual findings in subsamples indicate that the POOL approach may be beneficial for certain learners (e.g., learners with low fear of missing out or learners tending toward problematic smartphone use). For school practice, these results indicate that organizational, economic, and ecological aspects appear to be the main factors in deciding about the mobile device access concept.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Education and Information Technologies
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13213-w
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Mobile Learning in Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.67

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mobile learning in the classroom – Should students bring mobile devices for learning, or should these be provided by schools?

Cornelia Denz, Barbara Leibrock, Susanne Heinicke, Felix Reer et al.
6 citations
Education and Information Technologies
Mobile Learning in Education
4.67
article

Mobile learning in the classroom – Should students bring mobile devices for learning, or should these be provided by schools?

Cornelia Denz, Barbara Leibrock, Susanne Heinicke, Felix Reer, Elmar Souvignier, Malte S. Ubben, Daniel Laumann, Dörthe Masemann, Annette Marohn, Stefan Heusler, Boris Forthmann, Robin Janzik, Fabienne E. Kremer, Maurice Krause, Gilbert Greefrath, Thorsten Quandt
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract In recent years, the importance of mobile devices has increased for education in general and more specifically for science and mathematics education. In the classroom, approaches for teaching with mobile devices include using student-owned devices (“bring your own device”; BYOD approach) or using school-owned devices from central pools (POOL approach). While many studies point out features of mobile learning and BYOD that are conducive to learning, a research gap can be identified in the analysis of effects of mobile device access concepts on teaching–learning processes. Thus, this study aimed to empirically compare BYOD and POOL approaches in terms of learning performance and cognitive performance (subject knowledge development, cognitive load, concentration performance). Furthermore, the analyses included specific characteristics and preconditions (gender, socioeconomic status, fear of missing out, problematic smartphone use). A quasi-experimental study (two groups) was conducted in year 8 and 9 physics classes ( N = 339 students) in which smartphones are used for different purposes. The present data show no group differences between the BYOD and the POOL approach in the group of learners with respect to subject knowledge development, cognitive load, and concentration performance. However, individual findings in subsamples indicate that the POOL approach may be beneficial for certain learners (e.g., learners with low fear of missing out or learners tending toward problematic smartphone use). For school practice, these results indicate that organizational, economic, and ecological aspects appear to be the main factors in deciding about the mobile device access concept.

Education and Information TechnologiesVol. 30(7)
Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (DE), University of Münster (DE), FH Münster University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Westfälische Wilhelms-Universität Münster
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mobile Learning in Education
4.67
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.