The Russian invasion of Ukraine and changes in MEPs’ conceptions of security

Abstract Options of organizing security are often determined by how it is conceived. The paper focuses on how European security has been discussed in the European Parliament in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Drawing on parliamentary debates and meaning-making of security, we construct a threefold argument. Firstly, when MEPs discuss whose security needs to be addressed, we observe no significant changes between 2014 and 2022, but a decrease in the imagined distance between the EU and Ukraine and increase in the animosity toward Russia. Secondly, we show that security is continuously defined more broadly and extends to issues such as food, cyber, and civilian security. Finally, organizing security is increasingly viewed in competitive terms as opposed to a cooperative approach with Russia and has a strong focus on the EU’s independent agency in 2022.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Politics
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41311-024-00646-w
Citations
1
Primary Topic
European Union Policy and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Russian invasion of Ukraine and changes in MEPs’ conceptions of security

Levan Kakhishvili, Alina Felder‐Stindt
1 citations
International Politics
European Union Policy and Governance
2.23
article

The Russian invasion of Ukraine and changes in MEPs’ conceptions of security

Levan Kakhishvili, Alina Felder‐Stindt
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Options of organizing security are often determined by how it is conceived. The paper focuses on how European security has been discussed in the European Parliament in response to the Russian annexation of Crimea in 2014 and the Russian invasion of Ukraine in 2022. Drawing on parliamentary debates and meaning-making of security, we construct a threefold argument. Firstly, when MEPs discuss whose security needs to be addressed, we observe no significant changes between 2014 and 2022, but a decrease in the imagined distance between the EU and Ukraine and increase in the animosity toward Russia. Secondly, we show that security is continuously defined more broadly and extends to issues such as food, cyber, and civilian security. Finally, organizing security is increasingly viewed in competitive terms as opposed to a cooperative approach with Russia and has a strong focus on the EU’s independent agency in 2022.

International PoliticsVol. 62(5)
University of St.Gallen (CH), ETH Zurich (CH)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
European Union Policy and Governance
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The Russian invasion of Ukraine and changes in MEPs’ conceptions of security — Levan Kakhishvili, Alina Felder‐Stindt · International Politics (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS