Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing Obfuscation

Obfuscating people’s faces using synthetically generated faces, i.e., DeepFakes, has been shown to be effective at privacy preservation. While recent work showed that DeepFake obfuscation is well perceived by viewers, the perspectives of a) the owner of the obfuscated photo, and b) the person that is being obfuscated, remain unclear. This paper reports on the results of a user study where participants uploaded their own group photos, in which they appear, and applied obfuscation techniques to both themselves and others in the image. The obfuscation methods included DeepFakes and four traditional techniques: blurring, pixelating, masking, and avatars. Our findings show that both photo owners and obfuscated individuals perceive DeepFake obfuscation as significantly more effective in protecting privacy compared to the traditional methods, and was found to integrate well with the environment.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3701571.3701602
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing Obfuscation

Mohamed Khamis, Shaun Macdonald, Habiba Farzand, Marija Mumm et al.
3 citations
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
3.40
article

Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing Obfuscation

Mohamed Khamis, Shaun Macdonald, Habiba Farzand, Marija Mumm, Karola Marky, Rebecca Panskus
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Obfuscating people’s faces using synthetically generated faces, i.e., DeepFakes, has been shown to be effective at privacy preservation. While recent work showed that DeepFake obfuscation is well perceived by viewers, the perspectives of a) the owner of the obfuscated photo, and b) the person that is being obfuscated, remain unclear. This paper reports on the results of a user study where participants uploaded their own group photos, in which they appear, and applied obfuscation techniques to both themselves and others in the image. The obfuscation methods included DeepFakes and four traditional techniques: blurring, pixelating, masking, and avatars. Our findings show that both photo owners and obfuscated individuals perceive DeepFake obfuscation as significantly more effective in protecting privacy compared to the traditional methods, and was found to integrate well with the environment.

University of Glasgow (GB), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
University of Glasgow, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Privacy, Security, and Data Protection
3.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Perspectives on DeepFakes for Privacy: Comparing Perceptions of Photo Owners and Obfuscated Individuals towards DeepFake Versus Traditional Privacy-Enhancing Obfuscation — Mohamed Khamis, Shaun Macdonald, et al. · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS