Can Someone Be Unworthy to Exercise Their Right to Vote?

Over time, the generality of the right to vote has become an accepted principle, but it is still possible to disenfranchise a person if they have committed a crime. In international practice, this ground for disenfranchisement is considered accepted, but the ECtHR has pointed out that individualization and discretion are essential. National practice in this respect is quite varied: in some countries, offenders are automatically excluded, but in other countries, this should not happen in any case, and in the third category the disfranchisement is only possible on a case-by-case basis. According to the current Hungarian legislation, the exclusion is only possible if the offender is sentenced to a custodial sentence and is also disqualified from public affairs. The Hungarian practice is in line with the ECtHR practice, however, on the basis of statistical, disenfranchisement for criminal offences remains quasi-automatic. Therefore, the study also outlines possible solutions that could make the Hungarian legislation more forward-looking.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Comparative Law Review
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12775/clr.2024.004
Primary Topic
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Someone Be Unworthy to Exercise Their Right to Vote?

Gábor Kurunczi
Comparative Law Review
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
article

Can Someone Be Unworthy to Exercise Their Right to Vote?

Gábor Kurunczi
article en

Abstract

Over time, the generality of the right to vote has become an accepted principle, but it is still possible to disenfranchise a person if they have committed a crime. In international practice, this ground for disenfranchisement is considered accepted, but the ECtHR has pointed out that individualization and discretion are essential. National practice in this respect is quite varied: in some countries, offenders are automatically excluded, but in other countries, this should not happen in any case, and in the third category the disfranchisement is only possible on a case-by-case basis. According to the current Hungarian legislation, the exclusion is only possible if the offender is sentenced to a custodial sentence and is also disqualified from public affairs. The Hungarian practice is in line with the ECtHR practice, however, on the basis of statistical, disenfranchisement for criminal offences remains quasi-automatic. Therefore, the study also outlines possible solutions that could make the Hungarian legislation more forward-looking.

Comparative Law ReviewVol. 30
Pázmány Péter Catholic University (HU)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
European Criminal Justice and Data Protection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Can Someone Be Unworthy to Exercise Their Right to Vote? — Gábor Kurunczi · Comparative Law Review (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS