Curvature limits for composite steel box girder bridges

Composite concrete deck over steel box girder bridges are used in curved alignments as an economical solution because of their high flexural and torsional strength. Curvature effects on bending, shear and deflection may be ignored for bridges with light curvature. The Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC), the American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (Aashto) guide specifications for horizontally curved bridges and Aashto LRFD bridge design specifications specify limitations to treat a horizontally curved bridge as a straight one in structural design for only girder bending moment. Also, CHBDC curvature limitation does not differentiate between open and closed bridge cross-sections. The curvature limitation of the Aashto guide does not consider the effect of bridge width, leading to an inaccurate estimate of the structural response. To investigate the accuracy of these curvature limitations, a series of horizontally curved composite steel box girder bridges were analysed using finite-element modelling. The key parameters considered in this study were the degree of curvature and bridge span, width and continuity. Longitudinal bending stresses, support reactions, deflections and frequencies were determined and compared with those obtained for straight bridges of identical configurations. Results showed that code curvature limits were unsafe and needed to be updated. Empirical expressions were developed to determine curvature limits more accurately and reliably.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1680/jbren.24.00042
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.21
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Curvature limits for composite steel box girder bridges

Khaled Sennah, Imad Eldin Khalafalla
1 citations
Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge Engineering
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.21
article

Curvature limits for composite steel box girder bridges

Khaled Sennah, Imad Eldin Khalafalla
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Composite concrete deck over steel box girder bridges are used in curved alignments as an economical solution because of their high flexural and torsional strength. Curvature effects on bending, shear and deflection may be ignored for bridges with light curvature. The Canadian highway bridge design code (CHBDC), the American Association for State Highway and Transportation Officials (Aashto) guide specifications for horizontally curved bridges and Aashto LRFD bridge design specifications specify limitations to treat a horizontally curved bridge as a straight one in structural design for only girder bending moment. Also, CHBDC curvature limitation does not differentiate between open and closed bridge cross-sections. The curvature limitation of the Aashto guide does not consider the effect of bridge width, leading to an inaccurate estimate of the structural response. To investigate the accuracy of these curvature limitations, a series of horizontally curved composite steel box girder bridges were analysed using finite-element modelling. The key parameters considered in this study were the degree of curvature and bridge span, width and continuity. Longitudinal bending stresses, support reactions, deflections and frequencies were determined and compared with those obtained for straight bridges of identical configurations. Results showed that code curvature limits were unsafe and needed to be updated. Empirical expressions were developed to determine curvature limits more accurately and reliably.

Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Bridge EngineeringVol. 179(1)
Georgian College (CA), Metropolitan University (RS), Toronto Metropolitan University (CA)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Railway Engineering and Dynamics
0.21
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.