How the δ<sup>18</sup>O<sub>NO<sub>3</sub></sub> versus δ<sup>15</sup>N<sub>NO<sub>3</sub></sub> Plot Can Be Used to Identify a Typical Expected Isotopic Range of Denitrification for NO<sub>3</sub>-Impacted Groundwaters

Stable isotope values of δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 of dissolved nitrate (NO3) are commonly used to identify the occurrence of denitrification as there is a progressive increase of δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 values accompanied by a decrease in NO3 concentration. Thus, denitrification results in a positive trendline on the dual plot of δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3. The combination of two trendlines with different slopes provides the “typical expected isotopic range of denitrification (TEIRD)” on the δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3 plot. Many studies distinguished denitrified groundwaters by applying the TEIRD concept that is incorrectly introduced because it assumes a single NO3 source even though multiple NO3 sources exist. Also, most TEIRD applications rely on specific denitrification slopes although these are known to vary owing to the aquifer’s changing biogeochemical conditions. Alternatively, an accurate delineation of the TEIRD requires the identification of all potential NO3 sources in aquifer with their measured or reconstructed δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 values. This allows then for an accurate TEIRD to be traced with two denitrification trendlines having a slope corresponding to that from the correlation of the measured δ18ONO3 and δ15NNO3 values. Ultimately, each NO3 source can have a specific TEIRD, although denitrification trendlines for multiple NO3 sources can feature the same slope within a single aquifer.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.4c00796
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.19

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How the δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3 Plot Can Be Used to Identify a Typical Expected Isotopic Range of Denitrification for NO3-Impacted Groundwaters

Elisa Sacchi, Randy L. Stotler, Frédéric Huneau, Mónica Blarasin et al.
15 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
5.19
article

How the δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3 Plot Can Be Used to Identify a Typical Expected Isotopic Range of Denitrification for NO3-Impacted Groundwaters

Elisa Sacchi, Randy L. Stotler, Frédéric Huneau, Mónica Blarasin, Ioannis Matiatos, Romain Chesnaux, Bernhard Mayer, Karen H. Johannesson, Lamine Boumaiza, Neus Otero, Viviana Ré, Kay Knöller
article en
15 citations

Abstract

Stable isotope values of δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 of dissolved nitrate (NO3) are commonly used to identify the occurrence of denitrification as there is a progressive increase of δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 values accompanied by a decrease in NO3 concentration. Thus, denitrification results in a positive trendline on the dual plot of δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3. The combination of two trendlines with different slopes provides the “typical expected isotopic range of denitrification (TEIRD)” on the δ18ONO3 versus δ15NNO3 plot. Many studies distinguished denitrified groundwaters by applying the TEIRD concept that is incorrectly introduced because it assumes a single NO3 source even though multiple NO3 sources exist. Also, most TEIRD applications rely on specific denitrification slopes although these are known to vary owing to the aquifer’s changing biogeochemical conditions. Alternatively, an accurate delineation of the TEIRD requires the identification of all potential NO3 sources in aquifer with their measured or reconstructed δ15NNO3 and δ18ONO3 values. This allows then for an accurate TEIRD to be traced with two denitrification trendlines having a slope corresponding to that from the correlation of the measured δ18ONO3 and δ15NNO3 values. Ultimately, each NO3 source can have a specific TEIRD, although denitrification trendlines for multiple NO3 sources can feature the same slope within a single aquifer.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 4(12)
Université du Québec à Chicoutimi (CA), University of Pisa (IT), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Planetary Science Institute (US), Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research (DE), Université de Corse Pascal Paoli (FR), University of Waterloo (CA), Universidad Nacional de Río Cuarto (AR), Hydro Tasmania (AU), University of Calgary (CA), University of Pavia (IT), Cégep de Chicoutimi (CA), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), Hellenic Centre for Marine Research (GR), Department of Energy and Environment (US), Institute of Mineralogy (RU), Environmental Earth Sciences (AU), Institute of Hydroecology (CN), Universitat de Barcelona (ES), The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovación y Universidades
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
5.19
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.