A Multi-Pronged Collaborative Approach to Harness the Implementation and Sustainability of Bedside Shift Report

Background: Implementing nurse bedside shift report (BSR) remains a critical practice during shift changes that improves the delivery of safe patient care. The practice of BSR remains susceptible to variability and sustainability in the acute care setting. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to harness the implementation and sustainability of BSR using a multi-pronged approach. We aimed to improve nurse-sensitive indicators discussed during the BSR process and include patients in the BSR process. Methods: Implementing Lorenzi and Riley's change cycle methodology, executives, leaders, and educators collaborated to create a multi-pronged approach to standardize the BSR process for nurses in acute care. Stakeholders were educated on the revised BSR process and observation tool. Nurse leaders conducted supportive BSR observations. Data monitoring of quality nurse-sensitive indicators and weekly BSR observation results were discussed at huddles, unit staff meetings, and monthly leadership meetings. The Chief Nursing Officer hosted monthly welcome sessions to onboard new nurses with the BSR process. Results: Notable changes in standardization and sustainability of the BSR process were observed. There was an improvement in nurse-sensitive indicators related to falls, central-line infections, urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pressure injuries. There was a 23% improvement in patient experience metrics and a 58% improvement in nurse-sensitive quality metrics (falls, hospital-acquired pressure injuries, central-line associated bloodstream infections, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections) over 24 months. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of standardized education and leadership support in achieving consistent BSR practices. Conclusion: A collaborative approach involving leaders, educators, and bedside nurses was critical to hardwiring BSR processes and improving patient quality outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55481/2578-3750.1202
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Multi-Pronged Collaborative Approach to Harness the Implementation and Sustainability of Bedside Shift Report

Lourdes C Castaneda, Diane S Kramer, Catherina Chang Martinez, Yessenia Muniz et al.
Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
article

A Multi-Pronged Collaborative Approach to Harness the Implementation and Sustainability of Bedside Shift Report

Lourdes C Castaneda, Diane S Kramer, Catherina Chang Martinez, Yessenia Muniz, Harold Girado, Lucero Cahuana-Hurtado, Shelli Anne Marie Chernesky
article en

Abstract

Background: Implementing nurse bedside shift report (BSR) remains a critical practice during shift changes that improves the delivery of safe patient care. The practice of BSR remains susceptible to variability and sustainability in the acute care setting. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to harness the implementation and sustainability of BSR using a multi-pronged approach. We aimed to improve nurse-sensitive indicators discussed during the BSR process and include patients in the BSR process. Methods: Implementing Lorenzi and Riley's change cycle methodology, executives, leaders, and educators collaborated to create a multi-pronged approach to standardize the BSR process for nurses in acute care. Stakeholders were educated on the revised BSR process and observation tool. Nurse leaders conducted supportive BSR observations. Data monitoring of quality nurse-sensitive indicators and weekly BSR observation results were discussed at huddles, unit staff meetings, and monthly leadership meetings. The Chief Nursing Officer hosted monthly welcome sessions to onboard new nurses with the BSR process. Results: Notable changes in standardization and sustainability of the BSR process were observed. There was an improvement in nurse-sensitive indicators related to falls, central-line infections, urinary tract infections, and hospital-acquired pressure injuries. There was a 23% improvement in patient experience metrics and a 58% improvement in nurse-sensitive quality metrics (falls, hospital-acquired pressure injuries, central-line associated bloodstream infections, and catheter-associated urinary tract infections) over 24 months. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of standardized education and leadership support in achieving consistent BSR practices. Conclusion: A collaborative approach involving leaders, educators, and bedside nurses was critical to hardwiring BSR processes and improving patient quality outcomes.

Nursing & Health Sciences Research JournalVol. 7(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 61%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Multi-Pronged Collaborative Approach to Harness the Implementation and Sustainability of Bedside Shift Report — Lourdes C Castaneda, Diane S Kramer, et al. · Nursing & Health Sciences Research Journal (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS