Iran’s Security Strategy: Balancing Defensive Deterrents and Offensive Proxy Warfare

The objective of this study is to ascertain how proxy warfare is integrated into Iran’s security strategy. The argument is based on an analysis of Iran’s security approach, which rests on three main pillars: its ballistic missile arsenal, nuclear program, and reliance on proxy warfare. While the first two is predominantly defensive in nature, the use of proxy warfare includes offensive or forward defense elements. Iran has actively engaged in various conflicts in the Middle East through the use of proxies. The deployment of proxy groups allows Iran to exert influence over conflicts while maintaining distance and pursuing its own objectives. Consequently, proxy warfare reinforces the other two pillars. Moreover, historically the three pillars of Iran’s security strategy can be traced back to the era of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. This reveals that there is a continuity in Iran’s security policies despite the alteration and transformation caused by the 1979 Islamic Revolution. This contiunity contributes to the formation of long term political patterns that increase the effectiveness of the the three pillars of the security strategy mentioned in the study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ADAM AKADEMİ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1573096
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.13
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Iran’s Security Strategy: Balancing Defensive Deterrents and Offensive Proxy Warfare

Melih Kazdal
1 citations
ADAM AKADEMİ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
1.13
article

Iran’s Security Strategy: Balancing Defensive Deterrents and Offensive Proxy Warfare

Melih Kazdal
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The objective of this study is to ascertain how proxy warfare is integrated into Iran’s security strategy. The argument is based on an analysis of Iran’s security approach, which rests on three main pillars: its ballistic missile arsenal, nuclear program, and reliance on proxy warfare. While the first two is predominantly defensive in nature, the use of proxy warfare includes offensive or forward defense elements. Iran has actively engaged in various conflicts in the Middle East through the use of proxies. The deployment of proxy groups allows Iran to exert influence over conflicts while maintaining distance and pursuing its own objectives. Consequently, proxy warfare reinforces the other two pillars. Moreover, historically the three pillars of Iran’s security strategy can be traced back to the era of Shah Mohammad Reza Pahlavi. This reveals that there is a continuity in Iran’s security policies despite the alteration and transformation caused by the 1979 Islamic Revolution. This contiunity contributes to the formation of long term political patterns that increase the effectiveness of the the three pillars of the security strategy mentioned in the study.

ADAM AKADEMİ Sosyal Bilimler DergisiVol. 14(2)
Mardin Artuklu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance
1.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.