Gestão Ambiental na FAB

The purpose of the research here presented was to establish whether there is a relation between the size of an Air Force Station and its level of environmental investment. It is classified as descriptive as to its objective, and as a sample based survey as to its design. First, basic information and ideas regarding environmental management were presented, situating the Brazilian Air Force in the context. Next, the methods used were described: to evaluate the size of the Stations, the number of employees was used, what was obtained by applying a form at the finance sectors involved; as for the environmental investment level, a questionnaire based on social responsibility indicators was used. Then the theoretical reference that conducted the study was verified, according to which large companies invest more in the protection of the environment than small and medium ones. Another chapter presented the answers received through the collecting instruments, taking the opportunity to justify the importance of the selected items. Last, according to the information collected, the Stations were classified as small, medium or large, ranked according to the score achieved through the questionnaire, and the results were compared according to the theoretical reference. It was concluded that the size of an Air Force Station does not affect its level of environmental investment. The sampling universe was the Afonsos field in the year 2007. The data presented was updated on May 20th, 2008.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
REVISTA DA UNIFA
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22480/revunifa.2009.21.770
Primary Topic
Environmental Sustainability and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Gestão Ambiental na FAB

F Machado
REVISTA DA UNIFA
Environmental Sustainability and Education
article

Gestão Ambiental na FAB

F Machado
article en

Abstract

The purpose of the research here presented was to establish whether there is a relation between the size of an Air Force Station and its level of environmental investment. It is classified as descriptive as to its objective, and as a sample based survey as to its design. First, basic information and ideas regarding environmental management were presented, situating the Brazilian Air Force in the context. Next, the methods used were described: to evaluate the size of the Stations, the number of employees was used, what was obtained by applying a form at the finance sectors involved; as for the environmental investment level, a questionnaire based on social responsibility indicators was used. Then the theoretical reference that conducted the study was verified, according to which large companies invest more in the protection of the environment than small and medium ones. Another chapter presented the answers received through the collecting instruments, taking the opportunity to justify the importance of the selected items. Last, according to the information collected, the Stations were classified as small, medium or large, ranked according to the score achieved through the questionnaire, and the results were compared according to the theoretical reference. It was concluded that the size of an Air Force Station does not affect its level of environmental investment. The sampling universe was the Afonsos field in the year 2007. The data presented was updated on May 20th, 2008.

REVISTA DA UNIFAVol. 21(24)
Academia da Força Aérea (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Environmental Sustainability and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.