The “Naturalistic Free Recall” dataset: four stories, hundreds of participants, and high-fidelity transcriptions

The "Naturalistic Free Recall" dataset provides transcribed verbal recollections of four spoken narratives collected from 229 participants. Each participant listened to two stories, varying in duration from approximately 8 to 13 minutes, recorded by different speakers. Subsequently, participants were tasked with verbally recalling the narrative content in as much detail as possible and in the correct order. The dataset includes high-fidelity, time-stamped text transcripts of both the original narratives and participants' recollections. To validate the dataset, we apply a previously published automated method to score memory performance for narrative content. Using this approach, we extend effects traditionally observed in classic list-learning paradigms. The analysis of narrative contents and its verbal recollection presents unique challenges compared to controlled list-learning experiments. To facilitate the use of these rich data by the community, we offer an overview of recent computational methods that can be used to annotate and evaluate key properties of narratives and their recollections. Using advancements in machine learning and natural language processing, these methods can help the community understand the role of event structure, discourse properties, prediction error, high-level semantic features (e.g., idioms, humor), and more. All experimental materials, code, and data are publicly available to facilitate new advances in understanding human memory.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Data
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-024-04082-6
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.39

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The “Naturalistic Free Recall” dataset: four stories, hundreds of participants, and high-fidelity transcriptions

Vy A. Vo, David Poeppel, Phoebe Chen, Todd M. Gureckis et al.
4 citations
Scientific Data
Topic Modeling
1.39
article

The “Naturalistic Free Recall” dataset: four stories, hundreds of participants, and high-fidelity transcriptions

Vy A. Vo, David Poeppel, Phoebe Chen, Todd M. Gureckis, Omri Raccah
article en
4 citations

Abstract

The "Naturalistic Free Recall" dataset provides transcribed verbal recollections of four spoken narratives collected from 229 participants. Each participant listened to two stories, varying in duration from approximately 8 to 13 minutes, recorded by different speakers. Subsequently, participants were tasked with verbally recalling the narrative content in as much detail as possible and in the correct order. The dataset includes high-fidelity, time-stamped text transcripts of both the original narratives and participants' recollections. To validate the dataset, we apply a previously published automated method to score memory performance for narrative content. Using this approach, we extend effects traditionally observed in classic list-learning paradigms. The analysis of narrative contents and its verbal recollection presents unique challenges compared to controlled list-learning experiments. To facilitate the use of these rich data by the community, we offer an overview of recent computational methods that can be used to annotate and evaluate key properties of narratives and their recollections. Using advancements in machine learning and natural language processing, these methods can help the community understand the role of event structure, discourse properties, prediction error, high-level semantic features (e.g., idioms, humor), and more. All experimental materials, code, and data are publicly available to facilitate new advances in understanding human memory.

Scientific DataVol. 11(1)
Intel (United States) (US), Yale University (US), Ernst Strüngmann Institute for Neuroscience (DE), Max Planck Institute for Brain Research (DE), New York University (US)
National Science Foundation, Intel Corporation
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Topic Modeling
1.39
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.