Representationalism and Molyneux's question: An intermodal approach based on quality space theory

Representationalism is the view that perceptual experience essentially involves being in a representational state and that the phenomenal character of perceptual experience is exhausted in its representational content. In this paper, I argue that the representationalist’s Simple Answer to Molyneux’s question does not work because it has phenomenologically implausible consequences. Since intramodal representationalism has serious shortcomings, I suggest that the representationalist should opt for an intermodal approach. Moreover, I argue that intermodal representationalism is best supported by quality space theory so as to make sense of the claim that visual and tactile experiences of an object of a given shape differ in their representational content. On this view, the representationalist’s response to Molyneux’s question ultimately depends on whether the cross-modal calibration of quality spaces is innate or learned.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.33735/phimisci.2024.11601
Primary Topic
Multisensory perception and integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Representationalism and Molyneux's question: An intermodal approach based on quality space theory

Daniel Mario Weger
Philosophy and the Mind Sciences
Multisensory perception and integration
article

Representationalism and Molyneux's question: An intermodal approach based on quality space theory

Daniel Mario Weger
article en

Abstract

Representationalism is the view that perceptual experience essentially involves being in a representational state and that the phenomenal character of perceptual experience is exhausted in its representational content. In this paper, I argue that the representationalist’s Simple Answer to Molyneux’s question does not work because it has phenomenologically implausible consequences. Since intramodal representationalism has serious shortcomings, I suggest that the representationalist should opt for an intermodal approach. Moreover, I argue that intermodal representationalism is best supported by quality space theory so as to make sense of the claim that visual and tactile experiences of an object of a given shape differ in their representational content. On this view, the representationalist’s response to Molyneux’s question ultimately depends on whether the cross-modal calibration of quality spaces is innate or learned.

Philosophy and the Mind SciencesVol. 5
Goethe University Frankfurt (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Multisensory perception and integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Representationalism and Molyneux's question: An intermodal approach based on quality space theory — Daniel Mario Weger · Philosophy and the Mind Sciences (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS