A quantitative assessment of GeoNet earthquake location quality in Aotearoa New Zealand

ABSTRACT Tens of thousands of earthquakes are located by GeoNet across Aotearoa every year. However, spatial variability – both in station coverage and earthquake distributions – produce heterogeneity in earthquake location quality throughout the GeoNet catalogue. Here we consider simple, established criteria (including station azimuthal coverage, minimum station distance, phase arrival coverage and fixed location criteria) to score earthquakes on a network location Quality Score (QS) scale of QS0 (unconstrained) to QS6 (best constrained). Significant variation in QS exists nationwide; 48% and 20% of earthquakes score QS6 for the North and South Islands respectively. The Hawkes Bay region scores highest (68% QS6) closely followed by other Hikurangi regions. However, several regions score extremely poorly, with Fiordland, West Coast, Nelson, Otago‐Southland and Auckland‐Northland regions having ≤5% QS6 events and >75% of events scoring QS3 or lower. Low QS mostly arises from the failure of minimum distance criteria, whereby the closest station is too far from the earthquake to provide sufficient depth control. Our analysis quantitatively assesses the impact of network heterogeneity on GeoNet earthquake catalogue location quality to inform end users. This work also provides motivation for the expansion of the weak‐motion network in critically under‐instrumented regions, especially those with high seismic hazard.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00288306.2024.2421309
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.74

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A quantitative assessment of GeoNet earthquake location quality in Aotearoa New Zealand

Katrina Jacobs, C. J. Chamberlain, Donna Eberhart‐Phillips, C. A. Williams et al.
5 citations
New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
1.74
article

A quantitative assessment of GeoNet earthquake location quality in Aotearoa New Zealand

Katrina Jacobs, C. J. Chamberlain, Donna Eberhart‐Phillips, C. A. Williams, Emily Warren‐Smith, Chris Rollins
article en
5 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tens of thousands of earthquakes are located by GeoNet across Aotearoa every year. However, spatial variability – both in station coverage and earthquake distributions – produce heterogeneity in earthquake location quality throughout the GeoNet catalogue. Here we consider simple, established criteria (including station azimuthal coverage, minimum station distance, phase arrival coverage and fixed location criteria) to score earthquakes on a network location Quality Score (QS) scale of QS0 (unconstrained) to QS6 (best constrained). Significant variation in QS exists nationwide; 48% and 20% of earthquakes score QS6 for the North and South Islands respectively. The Hawkes Bay region scores highest (68% QS6) closely followed by other Hikurangi regions. However, several regions score extremely poorly, with Fiordland, West Coast, Nelson, Otago‐Southland and Auckland‐Northland regions having ≤5% QS6 events and >75% of events scoring QS3 or lower. Low QS mostly arises from the failure of minimum distance criteria, whereby the closest station is too far from the earthquake to provide sufficient depth control. Our analysis quantitatively assesses the impact of network heterogeneity on GeoNet earthquake catalogue location quality to inform end users. This work also provides motivation for the expansion of the weak‐motion network in critically under‐instrumented regions, especially those with high seismic hazard.

New Zealand Journal of Geology and GeophysicsVol. 68(5)
GNS Science (NZ), Victoria University of Wellington (NZ)
Royal Society Te Apārangi, Crown Research Institutes
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
1.74
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.