Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study

Our study contributes to the existing body of literature by providing the perspectives of patients and carers most likely to encounter interoperability challenges and therefore those most ideally positioned to propose potential solutions. As highlighted by patients, researchers and policymakers should consider social, educational, and organisational solutions, in addition to technical solutions. Lack of interoperability (i.e., the ability to share a patient's health information electronically between healthcare providers) can affect the quality of care received. However, much of the existing research was done from the viewpoint of healthcare staff rather than from patients themselves. This study explored the views of patients regarding what they feel interoperability in the NHS is currently like, how they think it affects their care, and what they think can be done to improve it. Patients reported interoperability to often be poor. It caused inconvenience both to themselves and their healthcare provider, and negatively impacted their experience getting care overall. Patient suggestions for improvement included centralising and reducing the number of existing systems, having more training for healthcare staff, and supporting patients and other healthcare staff in managing their health data.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02789-5
Citations
7
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.95

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study

Olivia Lounsbury, Ana Luísa Neves, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Wardkes Darzi et al.
7 citations
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Electronic Health Records Systems
4.95
article

Patient and caregiver perceptions of electronic health records interoperability in the NHS and its impact on care quality: a focus group study

Olivia Lounsbury, Ana Luísa Neves, Hutan Ashrafian, Ara Wardkes Darzi, Jonathan Clarke, Edmond Li
article en
7 citations

Abstract

Our study contributes to the existing body of literature by providing the perspectives of patients and carers most likely to encounter interoperability challenges and therefore those most ideally positioned to propose potential solutions. As highlighted by patients, researchers and policymakers should consider social, educational, and organisational solutions, in addition to technical solutions. Lack of interoperability (i.e., the ability to share a patient's health information electronically between healthcare providers) can affect the quality of care received. However, much of the existing research was done from the viewpoint of healthcare staff rather than from patients themselves. This study explored the views of patients regarding what they feel interoperability in the NHS is currently like, how they think it affects their care, and what they think can be done to improve it. Patients reported interoperability to often be poor. It caused inconvenience both to themselves and their healthcare provider, and negatively impacted their experience getting care overall. Patient suggestions for improvement included centralising and reducing the number of existing systems, having more training for healthcare staff, and supporting patients and other healthcare staff in managing their health data.

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision MakingVol. 24(1)
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB), University of Oxford (GB), NIHR Imperial Biomedical Research Centre (GB), Imperial College London (GB)
Wellcome Trust, National Institute for Health and Care Research, Imperial College London, Patient Safety Translational Research Centre
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Electronic Health Records Systems
4.95
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.