Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda

As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Mentor Innovative Scholarship on Academic Advising
Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59236/mj2663320
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Education and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda

S. Howard, J.A. Rudy, Chris Venable, Ryan Scheckel
1 citations
The Mentor Innovative Scholarship on Academic Advising
Digital Education and Society
0.78
article

Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda

S. Howard, J.A. Rudy, Chris Venable, Ryan Scheckel
article en
1 citations

Abstract

As academic advising has been subsumed under the banner of institutional retention and the completion agenda, advising technologies have created new opportunities for tracking and sorting students. This has resulted in what we call panopticon advising, a philosophy and approach to advising characterized by intensive surveillance, intrusive outreach, and pursuit of retention above all other goals. We define and critique panopticon advising through the lens of Michel Foucault’s disciplinary society and Byung-Chul Han’s notion of psychopolitics, considering how surveillance technologies and friendly power lead to increasingly extractive and prescriptive relationships between students and advisers. We conclude without easy solutions, but rather questions that advisers must grapple with to determine if a future of panopticon advising is one they can live with.

The Mentor Innovative Scholarship on Academic AdvisingVol. 26
Texas Tech University (US), Texas Wesleyan University (US), Kent State University (US), The Ohio State University (US), Nebraska Wesleyan University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Digital Education and Society
0.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Panopticon Advising: Surveillance Capitalism in Service of the Completion Agenda — S. Howard, J.A. Rudy, et al. · The Mentor Innovative Scholarship on Academic Advising (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS