Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplant recipients- a systematic scoping review

This scoping review outlines the complexities of non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications among kidney transplant recipients, highlighting significant variability in adherence definitions, measurements, and intervention efficacy. Reported non-adherence rates vary widely (2-89 %), underscoring the need for standardisation of the definition of non-adherence in research. Findings suggest that non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication is driven by a mix of demographic, psychosocial, and transplant-specific factors. Future research should prioritise standardised definitions of adherence, validated tools to measure adherence, and focus on clinically significant outcomes in non-adherent populations to develop meaningful, impactful interventions for long-term patient benefit.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Transplantation Reviews
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trre.2024.100900
Citations
20
Primary Topic
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.16

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplant recipients- a systematic scoping review

Michael Corr, Gareth J. McKay, Andrew Walker, Alexander P. Maxwell
20 citations
Transplantation Reviews
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
10.16
article

Non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications in kidney transplant recipients- a systematic scoping review

Michael Corr, Gareth J. McKay, Andrew Walker, Alexander P. Maxwell
article en
20 citations

Abstract

This scoping review outlines the complexities of non-adherence to immunosuppressive medications among kidney transplant recipients, highlighting significant variability in adherence definitions, measurements, and intervention efficacy. Reported non-adherence rates vary widely (2-89 %), underscoring the need for standardisation of the definition of non-adherence in research. Findings suggest that non-adherence to immunosuppressive medication is driven by a mix of demographic, psychosocial, and transplant-specific factors. Future research should prioritise standardised definitions of adherence, validated tools to measure adherence, and focus on clinically significant outcomes in non-adherent populations to develop meaningful, impactful interventions for long-term patient benefit.

Transplantation ReviewsVol. 39(1)
Queen's University Belfast (GB), Belfast Metropolitan College (GB)
Canadian Institute for Theoretical Astrophysics, Health Service Executive, Queen's University Belfast, Queen's University, Medical Research Council
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
10.16
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.