Unified Assessment of Open and Ducted Propulsors

This paper reconciles the assessment of fan and propeller performance by deriving common metrics that describe their design and operational characteristics and applies them to real-world design examples. Historically, various applications with large differences in flight Mach number and thrust requirements have led to different design methodologies and performance descriptors for ducted and unducted propulsors, making direct comparisons between these propulsion concepts challenging until today. One of the limitations of conventional propeller design methods is the difficulty in isolating the aerodynamic performance of blade sections from the overall design concept. The overall efficiency is largely impacted by top-level design parameters, while the aerodynamic quality is determined by the shaping and spanwise stacking of blade profiles. In contrast, turbomachinery design focuses primarily on the efficiency of the compression process and their respective efficiency metrics. This paper addresses these issues by systematically breaking down propeller efficiency into contributions commonly used in turbomachinery design. By applying consistent methodologies, we thereby enable a fair and quantitative comparison of the potential performance benefit of each concept. Furthermore, using common performance metrics simplifies the design process, making it more accessible to less experienced designers and facilitating the exploration of alternative design approaches for unducted propulsors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace11121002
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.81
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unified Assessment of Open and Ducted Propulsors

Maximilian Mennicken, Rainer Schnell
3 citations
Aerospace
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
0.81
article

Unified Assessment of Open and Ducted Propulsors

Maximilian Mennicken, Rainer Schnell
article en
3 citations

Abstract

This paper reconciles the assessment of fan and propeller performance by deriving common metrics that describe their design and operational characteristics and applies them to real-world design examples. Historically, various applications with large differences in flight Mach number and thrust requirements have led to different design methodologies and performance descriptors for ducted and unducted propulsors, making direct comparisons between these propulsion concepts challenging until today. One of the limitations of conventional propeller design methods is the difficulty in isolating the aerodynamic performance of blade sections from the overall design concept. The overall efficiency is largely impacted by top-level design parameters, while the aerodynamic quality is determined by the shaping and spanwise stacking of blade profiles. In contrast, turbomachinery design focuses primarily on the efficiency of the compression process and their respective efficiency metrics. This paper addresses these issues by systematically breaking down propeller efficiency into contributions commonly used in turbomachinery design. By applying consistent methodologies, we thereby enable a fair and quantitative comparison of the potential performance benefit of each concept. Furthermore, using common performance metrics simplifies the design process, making it more accessible to less experienced designers and facilitating the exploration of alternative design approaches for unducted propulsors.

AerospaceVol. 11(12)
Deutsches Zentrum für Luft- und Raumfahrt e. V. (DLR) (DE)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Cavitation Phenomena in Pumps
0.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.