Improving pipe perforation estimates from ultrasonic imaging using subpixel machine learning trained on optical data

During well completion, well pipes are perforated to gain access the reservoir. The size and shape of the perforated holes can be found from these holes’ outlines, which are generally estimated by optical or ultrasonic image logging. While optical imaging typically has a much higher spatial resolution than ultrasonic imaging and thus allows more precise outline estimates, optical imaging requires transparent liquids inside the pipe. Ultrasonic imaging, on the other hand, can be performed in a wider variety of liquids and can provide further information about the well state from the same measurement. One strategy is therefore to combine both types of measurement on the same toolstring. Thus, ultrasonic imaging can take over the job of estimating hole outlines from optical imaging when the liquid is no longer sufficiently transparent. One issue with this strategy is that the agreement between these two imaging techniques currently leaves much to be desired. This work addresses this issue by training a machine learning (ML)-based subpixel segmentation algorithm to take ultrasonic images of perforations and reproduce perforation outline estimates made from optical images. This approach assists the algorithm in drawing out information from the ultrasonic data which is not easily accessible using traditional image processing techniques. We use a dataset of 390 perforations, measured by both an optical and an ultrasonic tool, to train and test the machine learning algorithm. For comparison, we use a baseline algorithm based on interpolation and image thresholding. We evaluate the algorithms’ performance according to their estimated outlines’ match with the optical outlines. The outlines’ overlap is quantified via the intersection over union metric (baseline: 50.8 %, ML: 74.2 %; higher is better), and their area match is quantified via mean relative area error and compared to the results of another study from the literature (baseline: 54.4 %, ML: 18.7 %, other study: 54.5 %; lower is better). • We present a machine learning algorithm to segment pipe perforation holes. • The algorithm reproduces optical segmentations from ultrasonic data. • It vastly outperforms a baseline algorithm based on traditional image processing. • We find better performance than seen in previously reported work in the literature.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213541
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.85
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Improving pipe perforation estimates from ultrasonic imaging using subpixel machine learning trained on optical data

Sigurd Vangen Wifstad, S. Brekke, Erlend Magnus Viggen, Brendan J. Hicks et al.
4 citations
Geoenergy Science and Engineering
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
0.85
article

Improving pipe perforation estimates from ultrasonic imaging using subpixel machine learning trained on optical data

Sigurd Vangen Wifstad, S. Brekke, Erlend Magnus Viggen, Brendan J. Hicks, Sondre Grønsberg
article en
4 citations

Abstract

During well completion, well pipes are perforated to gain access the reservoir. The size and shape of the perforated holes can be found from these holes’ outlines, which are generally estimated by optical or ultrasonic image logging. While optical imaging typically has a much higher spatial resolution than ultrasonic imaging and thus allows more precise outline estimates, optical imaging requires transparent liquids inside the pipe. Ultrasonic imaging, on the other hand, can be performed in a wider variety of liquids and can provide further information about the well state from the same measurement. One strategy is therefore to combine both types of measurement on the same toolstring. Thus, ultrasonic imaging can take over the job of estimating hole outlines from optical imaging when the liquid is no longer sufficiently transparent. One issue with this strategy is that the agreement between these two imaging techniques currently leaves much to be desired. This work addresses this issue by training a machine learning (ML)-based subpixel segmentation algorithm to take ultrasonic images of perforations and reproduce perforation outline estimates made from optical images. This approach assists the algorithm in drawing out information from the ultrasonic data which is not easily accessible using traditional image processing techniques. We use a dataset of 390 perforations, measured by both an optical and an ultrasonic tool, to train and test the machine learning algorithm. For comparison, we use a baseline algorithm based on interpolation and image thresholding. We evaluate the algorithms’ performance according to their estimated outlines’ match with the optical outlines. The outlines’ overlap is quantified via the intersection over union metric (baseline: 50.8 %, ML: 74.2 %; higher is better), and their area match is quantified via mean relative area error and compared to the results of another study from the literature (baseline: 54.4 %, ML: 18.7 %, other study: 54.5 %; lower is better). • We present a machine learning algorithm to segment pipe perforation holes. • The algorithm reproduces optical segmentations from ultrasonic data. • It vastly outperforms a baseline algorithm based on traditional image processing. • We find better performance than seen in previously reported work in the literature.

Geoenergy Science and EngineeringVol. 246
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO), Oklahoma City University (US), University of Bergen (NO)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 29%
Non-Destructive Testing Techniques
0.85
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.