Linear Ablation Using a Contact Force-Sensing Catheter in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact force (CF)-sensing technology has improved long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. This prospective randomized study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CF-sensing technology for additional left atrial (LA) linear ablation of persistent AF (PerAF). <b>Methods</b>: After PVI, anteromitral (AM) line and roof line ablation were performed using a CF-sensing catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CF-sensing (CFS) group or the CF-blind control (Blind) group. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. LA late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) MRI was conducted at baseline and 1-year follow-up for long-term lesion evaluation. <b>Results</b>: A total of 62 patients with drug-refractory PerAF were enrolled (mean age: 58 ± 10 years; 77% male). The success rates of AM and roof line block were 97% and 100% in the CFS group (n = 33) and 93% and 90% in the Blind group (n = 29). The time to achieve block was reduced in the CFS group (AM: 36 ± 22 vs. 48 ± 28 min, <i>p</i> = 0.068; roof: 19 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 15 min, <i>p</i> = 0.031). The maximum CF for safety endpoints was significantly lower in the CFS group (AM: 42 vs. 69 g, <i>p</i> < 0.001; roof: 33 vs. 49 g, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Full linear LA-LGE formation on 1-year MRI did not differ significantly between the groups (AM: 17 vs. 36%; roof; 29 vs. 24%, both <i>p</i> = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after ablation procedures were 63.6% in the CFS group and 58.6% in the Blind group (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.837). <b>Conclusions</b>: In patients with PerAF, additional LA linear ablation following PVI using CF-sensing technology improved procedural safety and reduced the time needed to achieve conduction block. However, it did not significantly influence clinical outcomes or the formation of permanent full linear lesions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13237310
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.40

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Linear Ablation Using a Contact Force-Sensing Catheter in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Kwang‐No Lee, Dae In Lee, Jaemin Shim, Seung‐Young Roh et al.
1 citations
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
0.40
article

Linear Ablation Using a Contact Force-Sensing Catheter in Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: A Prospective Randomized Trial

Kwang‐No Lee, Dae In Lee, Jaemin Shim, Seung‐Young Roh, Jong‐Il Choi, Young-Hoon Kim, Yun Gi Kim
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using radiofrequency catheter ablation with contact force (CF)-sensing technology has improved long-term outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation. This prospective randomized study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of CF-sensing technology for additional left atrial (LA) linear ablation of persistent AF (PerAF). <b>Methods</b>: After PVI, anteromitral (AM) line and roof line ablation were performed using a CF-sensing catheter. Patients were randomly assigned to either the CF-sensing (CFS) group or the CF-blind control (Blind) group. The primary endpoint was atrial arrhythmia recurrence. LA late gadolinium enhancement (LA-LGE) MRI was conducted at baseline and 1-year follow-up for long-term lesion evaluation. <b>Results</b>: A total of 62 patients with drug-refractory PerAF were enrolled (mean age: 58 ± 10 years; 77% male). The success rates of AM and roof line block were 97% and 100% in the CFS group (n = 33) and 93% and 90% in the Blind group (n = 29). The time to achieve block was reduced in the CFS group (AM: 36 ± 22 vs. 48 ± 28 min, <i>p</i> = 0.068; roof: 19 ± 14 vs. 27 ± 15 min, <i>p</i> = 0.031). The maximum CF for safety endpoints was significantly lower in the CFS group (AM: 42 vs. 69 g, <i>p</i> < 0.001; roof: 33 vs. 49 g, <i>p</i> = 0.003). Full linear LA-LGE formation on 1-year MRI did not differ significantly between the groups (AM: 17 vs. 36%; roof; 29 vs. 24%, both <i>p</i> = NS). Kaplan-Meier estimates of AF/AT-free survival after ablation procedures were 63.6% in the CFS group and 58.6% in the Blind group (log-rank <i>p</i> = 0.837). <b>Conclusions</b>: In patients with PerAF, additional LA linear ablation following PVI using CF-sensing technology improved procedural safety and reduced the time needed to achieve conduction block. However, it did not significantly influence clinical outcomes or the formation of permanent full linear lesions.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 13(23)
Korea University Medical Center (KR), Ajou University Hospital (KR)
Biosense Webster
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 30%
Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
0.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.