A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter

Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern in South Africa and internationally. Literature on vaccine hesitancy associates this with mistrust of the government. We present a qualitative analysis of opinions about COVID-19 vaccination expressed by South African Twitter (now X) users during the first year of the vaccine rollout in South Africa. We conducted a thematic analysis of 800 randomly selected tweets containing vaccine-related keywords, sampled from four time periods in 2021. We categorised comprehensible South African non-news tweets as pro-vaccination (24.75% of sample), anti-vaccination (20.25%) or ambivalent (4.5%), and then identified themes. Among pro-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were criticism of the government’s handling of vaccine procurement and the rollout; concerns that the vaccine was urgently needed and/or not being made available fast enough; and statements that vaccines were safe and/or effective against COVID-19. Among anti-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were claims that the vaccine was harmful or too risky; suspicion of the government’s intentions with respect to the vaccine it was offering the public; and opposition to mandatory or ‘forced’ vaccination. Criticism and mistrust of the government were present among both pro- and anti-vaccination tweets, though for different reasons. We discuss this in light of literature recommending trust-building as a response to vaccine hesitancy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
South African Journal of Science
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2024/17423
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Misinformation and Its Impacts
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.26

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter

Philippa Kerr, Kevin Durrheim, Maria Schuld, Davide Morselli
2 citations
South African Journal of Science
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
article

A thematic analysis of South African opinions about COVID-19 vaccination on Twitter

Philippa Kerr, Kevin Durrheim, Maria Schuld, Davide Morselli
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Vaccine hesitancy is a public health concern in South Africa and internationally. Literature on vaccine hesitancy associates this with mistrust of the government. We present a qualitative analysis of opinions about COVID-19 vaccination expressed by South African Twitter (now X) users during the first year of the vaccine rollout in South Africa. We conducted a thematic analysis of 800 randomly selected tweets containing vaccine-related keywords, sampled from four time periods in 2021. We categorised comprehensible South African non-news tweets as pro-vaccination (24.75% of sample), anti-vaccination (20.25%) or ambivalent (4.5%), and then identified themes. Among pro-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were criticism of the government’s handling of vaccine procurement and the rollout; concerns that the vaccine was urgently needed and/or not being made available fast enough; and statements that vaccines were safe and/or effective against COVID-19. Among anti-vaccination tweets, the most common themes were claims that the vaccine was harmful or too risky; suspicion of the government’s intentions with respect to the vaccine it was offering the public; and opposition to mandatory or ‘forced’ vaccination. Criticism and mistrust of the government were present among both pro- and anti-vaccination tweets, though for different reasons. We discuss this in light of literature recommending trust-building as a response to vaccine hesitancy.

South African Journal of ScienceVol. 120(11/12)
University of Johannesburg (ZA), FORS – Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences (CH), University of Lausanne (CH)
National Research Foundation
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Misinformation and Its Impacts
2.26
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.