Development of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale (PFRRS): A Validity and Reliability Study

This research aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale. Data were collected from two separate study groups in 2024 to assess the validity and reliability of the developed measurement tool. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the construct validity of the scale. The results supported the single-factor structure of the six-item scale. To provide evidence for the convergent validity of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale, its scores were correlated with the Psychological Flexibility Scale and the convergent validity was supported by a significant correlation coefficient of .72 between the scales. Cronbach Alpha coefficients examined for the reliability of the scale are above acceptable limits in both exploratory (.77) and confirmatory (.71) factor analyses and support internal consistency. Item-total correlations indicated that the scale items were highly correlated with the general factor representing the scale. Independent samples t-tests conducted on the top and bottom 27% of the sample revealed significant differences, indicating that the scale could discriminate between individuals with high and low levels of psychological flexibility in romantic relationships. In conclusion, the developed scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research on Education and Psychology
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.54535/rep.1557924
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale (PFRRS): A Validity and Reliability Study

Selva BARKALE ŞAHİN, Erdal Hamarta
2 citations
Research on Education and Psychology
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
1.28
article

Development of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale (PFRRS): A Validity and Reliability Study

Selva BARKALE ŞAHİN, Erdal Hamarta
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This research aimed to investigate the psychometric properties of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale. Data were collected from two separate study groups in 2024 to assess the validity and reliability of the developed measurement tool. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses were conducted to assess the construct validity of the scale. The results supported the single-factor structure of the six-item scale. To provide evidence for the convergent validity of the Psychological Flexibility in Romantic Relationships Scale, its scores were correlated with the Psychological Flexibility Scale and the convergent validity was supported by a significant correlation coefficient of .72 between the scales. Cronbach Alpha coefficients examined for the reliability of the scale are above acceptable limits in both exploratory (.77) and confirmatory (.71) factor analyses and support internal consistency. Item-total correlations indicated that the scale items were highly correlated with the general factor representing the scale. Independent samples t-tests conducted on the top and bottom 27% of the sample revealed significant differences, indicating that the scale could discriminate between individuals with high and low levels of psychological flexibility in romantic relationships. In conclusion, the developed scale was found to be a valid and reliable measurement tool.

Research on Education and PsychologyVol. 8(2)
Necmettin Erbakan University (TR)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
1.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.