CompLex: Legal systems through the lens of complexity science

While "complexity science" has achieved significant successes in several interdisciplinary fields such as economics and biology, it is only a very recent observation that legal systems -from the way legal texts are drafted and connected to the rest of the corpus, up to the level of how judges and courts reach decisions under a variety of conflicting inputs- share several features with standard Complex Adaptive Systems. This review is meant as a gentle introduction to the use of quantitative tools and techniques of complexity science to describe, analyse, and tame the complex web of human interactions that the Law is supposed to regulate. We offer an overview of the main directions of research undertaken so far as well as an outlook for future research, and we argue that statistical physicists and complexity scientists should not ignore the opportunities offered by the cross-fertilisation between legal scholarship and complex-systems modelling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Europhysics Letters (EPL)
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/ad99fc
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.65

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CompLex: Legal systems through the lens of complexity science

Daniel Katz, J. B. Ruhl, Pierpaolo Vivo
5 citations
Europhysics Letters (EPL)
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
5.65
article

CompLex: Legal systems through the lens of complexity science

Daniel Katz, J. B. Ruhl, Pierpaolo Vivo
article en
5 citations

Abstract

While "complexity science" has achieved significant successes in several interdisciplinary fields such as economics and biology, it is only a very recent observation that legal systems -from the way legal texts are drafted and connected to the rest of the corpus, up to the level of how judges and courts reach decisions under a variety of conflicting inputs- share several features with standard Complex Adaptive Systems. This review is meant as a gentle introduction to the use of quantitative tools and techniques of complexity science to describe, analyse, and tame the complex web of human interactions that the Law is supposed to regulate. We offer an overview of the main directions of research undertaken so far as well as an outlook for future research, and we argue that statistical physicists and complexity scientists should not ignore the opportunities offered by the cross-fertilisation between legal scholarship and complex-systems modelling.

Europhysics Letters (EPL)Vol. 149(2)
Illinois Institute of Technology (US), King's College London (GB), Vanderbilt University (US), Chicago Kent College of Law (US), Stanford Medicine (US), Bucerius Law School (DE)
UK Research and Innovation
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
5.65
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.