Fire management now and in the future: Will today's solutions still apply tomorrow?

Climate change and fire management actions are the two key drivers of fire regime changes now and into the future. The predicted effects of these drivers vary between regions and global climate projections; however, it is expected that fire regimes globally are likely to intensify. Increased wildfire extent, frequency and severity mean impacts to people, property, infrastructure, production and the environment are also likely to increase under worsening climate conditions. Fire management programs aim to reduce the influence of worsening climatic conditions on wildfires and risk to assets now and into the future However, given the pace of changes to fire regimes, trade-offs between assets are increasingly likely. Therefore, understanding the cost-effectiveness of fire management in the form of both fuel management and suppression is critical for managers to make informed decisions regarding resource allocation. We develop and test a Bayesian Decision Network (BDN) incorporating data from ~1200 fire regime simulations capturing 16 management strategies across six regions and six climate models. We quantify the effects of management and climate on fire size and risk to environmental, infrastructure, and production assets, as well as people and property. We calculate the overall cost-effectiveness of the management scenario based on the cost of implementing the program and the subsequent cost of impacts caused by wildfires. We found that costs increased under future climate conditions for all management scenarios in most regions. Despite some regional variation in the cost-effectiveness of management scenarios we were able to identify key scenarios which consistently had high cost-effectiveness. These were combinations of prescribed burning and suppression. Importantly, the model clearly demonstrates the risk of a do-nothing approach and highlights that action is needed to prevent high impacts now and into the future and to reduce the overall costs of wildfires.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Science of The Total Environment
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.177863
Citations
9
Primary Topic
Fire effects on ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.54
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fire management now and in the future: Will today's solutions still apply tomorrow?

Erica M. Marshall, Trent D. Penman, Bruce G. Marcot, Kate Parkins
9 citations
The Science of The Total Environment
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.54
article

Fire management now and in the future: Will today's solutions still apply tomorrow?

Erica M. Marshall, Trent D. Penman, Bruce G. Marcot, Kate Parkins
article en
9 citations

Abstract

Climate change and fire management actions are the two key drivers of fire regime changes now and into the future. The predicted effects of these drivers vary between regions and global climate projections; however, it is expected that fire regimes globally are likely to intensify. Increased wildfire extent, frequency and severity mean impacts to people, property, infrastructure, production and the environment are also likely to increase under worsening climate conditions. Fire management programs aim to reduce the influence of worsening climatic conditions on wildfires and risk to assets now and into the future However, given the pace of changes to fire regimes, trade-offs between assets are increasingly likely. Therefore, understanding the cost-effectiveness of fire management in the form of both fuel management and suppression is critical for managers to make informed decisions regarding resource allocation. We develop and test a Bayesian Decision Network (BDN) incorporating data from ~1200 fire regime simulations capturing 16 management strategies across six regions and six climate models. We quantify the effects of management and climate on fire size and risk to environmental, infrastructure, and production assets, as well as people and property. We calculate the overall cost-effectiveness of the management scenario based on the cost of implementing the program and the subsequent cost of impacts caused by wildfires. We found that costs increased under future climate conditions for all management scenarios in most regions. Despite some regional variation in the cost-effectiveness of management scenarios we were able to identify key scenarios which consistently had high cost-effectiveness. These were combinations of prescribed burning and suppression. Importantly, the model clearly demonstrates the risk of a do-nothing approach and highlights that action is needed to prevent high impacts now and into the future and to reduce the overall costs of wildfires.

The Science of The Total EnvironmentVol. 957
The University of Melbourne (AU), Pacific Northwest Research Station (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Fire effects on ecosystems
2.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.