Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Detection: ML and DL Approaches

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a major problem in sports and physical activities; prompt and precise diagnosis is generally necessary for appropriate treatment and recovery. Even if they are trustworthy, traditional diagnostic techniques can be expensive, time-consuming, and prone to human mistake. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), are viable options for ACL injury categorization and detection. This study summarizes the state-of-the-art research on the use of ML and DL for ACL injury identification, emphasizing different approaches, datasets, and performance measures. We explore the benefits and drawbacks of current methods and point out directions for further study to improve clinical integration and diagnostic precision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icses63445.2024.10763125
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.57
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Detection: ML and DL Approaches

Rais Abdul Hamid Khan, Madhuri Kulkarni
1 citations
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
0.57
article

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear Detection: ML and DL Approaches

Rais Abdul Hamid Khan, Madhuri Kulkarni
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries are a major problem in sports and physical activities; prompt and precise diagnosis is generally necessary for appropriate treatment and recovery. Even if they are trustworthy, traditional diagnostic techniques can be expensive, time-consuming, and prone to human mistake. Artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, including machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL), are viable options for ACL injury categorization and detection. This study summarizes the state-of-the-art research on the use of ML and DL for ACL injury identification, emphasizing different approaches, datasets, and performance measures. We explore the benefits and drawbacks of current methods and point out directions for further study to improve clinical integration and diagnostic precision.

Sandip Foundation (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques
0.57
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.