TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Models

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has gained significant attention due to its real-world applications to improve the stability of modern software systems. However, there is no effective way to verify whether they can meet the requirements for real-world deployment. Firstly, current algorithms typically train a specific model for each time series. Maintaining such many models is impractical in a large-scale system with tens of thousands of curves. The performance of using merely one unified model to detect anomalies remains unknown. Secondly, most TSAD models are trained on the historical part of a time series and are tested on its future segment. In distributed systems, however, there are frequent system deployments and upgrades, with new, previously unseen time series emerging daily. The performance of testing newly incoming unseen time series on current TSAD algorithms remains unknown. Lastly, the assumptions of the evaluation metrics in existing benchmarks are far from practical demands. To solve the above-mentioned problems, we propose an industrial-grade benchmark TimeSeriesBench. We assess the performance of existing algorithms across more than 168 evaluation settings and provide comprehensive analysis for the future design of anomaly detection algorithms. An industrial dataset is also released along with TimeSeriesBench.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/issre62328.2024.00017
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.17

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Models

Gaogang Xie, Dan Pei, Jingwen Yang, Shenglin Zhang et al.
12 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
4.17
article

TimeSeriesBench: An Industrial-Grade Benchmark for Time Series Anomaly Detection Models

Gaogang Xie, Dan Pei, Jingwen Yang, Shenglin Zhang, Changhua Pei, Jingjing Li, Jianhui Li, Yongqian Sun, Haiming Zhang, Jing Han, Haotian Si, Hang Cui
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Time series anomaly detection (TSAD) has gained significant attention due to its real-world applications to improve the stability of modern software systems. However, there is no effective way to verify whether they can meet the requirements for real-world deployment. Firstly, current algorithms typically train a specific model for each time series. Maintaining such many models is impractical in a large-scale system with tens of thousands of curves. The performance of using merely one unified model to detect anomalies remains unknown. Secondly, most TSAD models are trained on the historical part of a time series and are tested on its future segment. In distributed systems, however, there are frequent system deployments and upgrades, with new, previously unseen time series emerging daily. The performance of testing newly incoming unseen time series on current TSAD algorithms remains unknown. Lastly, the assumptions of the evaluation metrics in existing benchmarks are far from practical demands. To solve the above-mentioned problems, we propose an industrial-grade benchmark TimeSeriesBench. We assess the performance of existing algorithms across more than 168 evaluation settings and provide comprehensive analysis for the future design of anomaly detection algorithms. An industrial dataset is also released along with TimeSeriesBench.

Jilin University (CN), Nankai University (CN), ZTE (China) (CN), Computer Network Information Center (CN), Tsinghua University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Chinese Academy of Sciences, National Key Research and Development Program of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
4.17
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.