Diamond Prices Estimation with ELM-Based Regressors

Society uses precious gems like diamonds for many specific purposes, but it has always been complex to measure their value. For this reason, we will use the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) to estimate diamond prices using a popular database, which contains 53,943 round-cut diamonds. The results show an optimal accuracy for both standard and regularized ELM regression models. The metrics studied in this work include Mean Squared Error (MSE), correlation coefficient, and, in terms of complexity, the number of neurons in the hidden layer and training times. The results showed low Mean Squared Error and correlation coefficients between 98% and 99% in most studied cases, similar to those seen in the state of the art. Our most representative metric for selecting the most optimal method is training time. We conclude that the regularized ELM using database No. 1 presents results with shorter training times.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sccc63879.2024.10767650
Primary Topic
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Diamond Prices Estimation with ELM-Based Regressors

David Zabala‐Blanco, Roberto Ahumada‐García, Marco Flores-Calero, José Ramírez et al.
2 links
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
article

Diamond Prices Estimation with ELM-Based Regressors

David Zabala‐Blanco, Roberto Ahumada‐García, Marco Flores-Calero, José Ramírez, Pablo Palacios Játiva, Ronald V. Saire-Yujra
article en

Abstract

Society uses precious gems like diamonds for many specific purposes, but it has always been complex to measure their value. For this reason, we will use the Extreme Learning Machine (ELM) to estimate diamond prices using a popular database, which contains 53,943 round-cut diamonds. The results show an optimal accuracy for both standard and regularized ELM regression models. The metrics studied in this work include Mean Squared Error (MSE), correlation coefficient, and, in terms of complexity, the number of neurons in the hidden layer and training times. The results showed low Mean Squared Error and correlation coefficients between 98% and 99% in most studied cases, similar to those seen in the state of the art. Our most representative metric for selecting the most optimal method is training time. We conclude that the regularized ELM using database No. 1 presents results with shorter training times.

Universidad de las Fuerzas Armadas ESPE (EC), Catholic University of the Maule (CL), Escuela Militar de Ingeniería, Universidad Diego Portales (CL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Stock Market Forecasting Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.