Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models

A major issue of concern in the financial sector, credit card fraud puts risks to financial institutions as well as consumers. Machine learning methods have become rather successful instruments for spotting fraudulent transactions in recent years. This work compares the detection of credit card fraud employing two well-known machine learning techniques: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and XGBoost. With a publicly available credit card transaction dataset, this work evaluates the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of these algorithms. Furthermore taken into consideration to evaluate their fit for real-time fraud detection systems are the computational efficiency and scalability of ANNs and XGBoost. Among the five suggested methods, ANN shows best with an accuracy of 96.9%; among the classifiers, XGBoost shows best with an accuracy of 92.7%. The findings give financial institutions trying to install or enhance fraud detection systems direction as well as insights on the strengths and constraints of every method. This study supports the continuous initiatives to improve financial security by means of advanced machine learning approaches and fight credit card fraud.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/icses63445.2024.10763059
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.69
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models

Kanwarpartap Singh Gill, Mohit Beri, Neha Sharma
2 citations
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.69
article

Enhancing Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Machine Learning Models

Kanwarpartap Singh Gill, Mohit Beri, Neha Sharma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

A major issue of concern in the financial sector, credit card fraud puts risks to financial institutions as well as consumers. Machine learning methods have become rather successful instruments for spotting fraudulent transactions in recent years. This work compares the detection of credit card fraud employing two well-known machine learning techniques: Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) and XGBoost. With a publicly available credit card transaction dataset, this work evaluates the accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score of these algorithms. Furthermore taken into consideration to evaluate their fit for real-time fraud detection systems are the computational efficiency and scalability of ANNs and XGBoost. Among the five suggested methods, ANN shows best with an accuracy of 96.9%; among the classifiers, XGBoost shows best with an accuracy of 92.7%. The findings give financial institutions trying to install or enhance fraud detection systems direction as well as insights on the strengths and constraints of every method. This study supports the continuous initiatives to improve financial security by means of advanced machine learning approaches and fight credit card fraud.

Chitkara University (IN)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Imbalanced Data Classification Techniques
0.69
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.