A Comparative Study of LQT Controller Design Using Reinforcement Learning Methods: A Case Study on Speed Control of the PMDC Motor

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Linear Quadratic Tracking (LQT) controller design using various Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods, applied specifically to speed control in Permanent Magnet Direct Current (PMDC) motors. Traditional LQT controllers typically depend on offline design and system modeling, limiting their adaptability in real-time applications. To overcome these limitations, we investigate three RL methods and evaluate their performance in terms of convergence rate, computation time, reliance on system models, and steady-state error. Furthermore, the study compares RL-based LQT controllers with conventional PID controllers. Results show that RL methods, particularly Q-learning, provide a model-free approach to optimal control design, achieving zero steady-state error and no overshoot, offering significant improvements over traditional PID methods.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/iccia65044.2024.10768119
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.35
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparative Study of LQT Controller Design Using Reinforcement Learning Methods: A Case Study on Speed Control of the PMDC Motor

Hamid Khaloozadeh, Pouria Omrani
1 citations
Neural Networks and Applications
0.35
article

A Comparative Study of LQT Controller Design Using Reinforcement Learning Methods: A Case Study on Speed Control of the PMDC Motor

Hamid Khaloozadeh, Pouria Omrani
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This paper presents a comparative analysis of Linear Quadratic Tracking (LQT) controller design using various Reinforcement Learning (RL) methods, applied specifically to speed control in Permanent Magnet Direct Current (PMDC) motors. Traditional LQT controllers typically depend on offline design and system modeling, limiting their adaptability in real-time applications. To overcome these limitations, we investigate three RL methods and evaluate their performance in terms of convergence rate, computation time, reliance on system models, and steady-state error. Furthermore, the study compares RL-based LQT controllers with conventional PID controllers. Results show that RL methods, particularly Q-learning, provide a model-free approach to optimal control design, achieving zero steady-state error and no overshoot, offering significant improvements over traditional PID methods.

K. N. Toosi University of Technology (IR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 31%
Neural Networks and Applications
0.35
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.