Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors - An Overlooked Perspective?

The ever-evolving landscape of attacks, coupled with the growing complexity of ICT systems, makes crafting anomaly-based intrusion detectors and error detectors difficult: they must accurately detect attacks and promptly perform detections. Although improving and comparing the detection capability is the focus of most research works, the timeliness of the detection is less considered and often insufficiently evaluated or discussed. In this paper, we argue the relevance of measuring the temporal latency of attacks and errors, and we propose an evaluation approach for detectors to ensure a trade-off between correct and in-time detection. Briefly, the approach relates the false positive rate with the temporal latency of attacks and errors, ultimately leading to guidelines for configuring a detector. We apply our approach by evaluating different intrusion and error detectors in two industrial cases: i) an embedded railway on-board system that optimizes public mobility, and ii) an edge device for the Industrial Internet of Things. Our results show that considering latency in addition to traditional metrics like the false positive rate, precision, and coverage gives an additional fundamental perspective on the actual performance of the detector and should be considered when assessing and configuring anomaly detectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/issre62328.2024.00015
Citations
8
Primary Topic
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.78
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors - An Overlooked Perspective?

Andrea Ceccarelli, Tommaso Puccetti
8 citations
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.78
article

Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors - An Overlooked Perspective?

Andrea Ceccarelli, Tommaso Puccetti
article en
8 citations

Abstract

The ever-evolving landscape of attacks, coupled with the growing complexity of ICT systems, makes crafting anomaly-based intrusion detectors and error detectors difficult: they must accurately detect attacks and promptly perform detections. Although improving and comparing the detection capability is the focus of most research works, the timeliness of the detection is less considered and often insufficiently evaluated or discussed. In this paper, we argue the relevance of measuring the temporal latency of attacks and errors, and we propose an evaluation approach for detectors to ensure a trade-off between correct and in-time detection. Briefly, the approach relates the false positive rate with the temporal latency of attacks and errors, ultimately leading to guidelines for configuring a detector. We apply our approach by evaluating different intrusion and error detectors in two industrial cases: i) an embedded railway on-board system that optimizes public mobility, and ii) an edge device for the Industrial Internet of Things. Our results show that considering latency in addition to traditional metrics like the false positive rate, precision, and coverage gives an additional fundamental perspective on the actual performance of the detector and should be considered when assessing and configuring anomaly detectors.

University of Florence (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
2.78
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Detection Latencies of Anomaly Detectors - An Overlooked Perspective? — Andrea Ceccarelli, Tommaso Puccetti · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS