Automated Interpretation of Fleet Incidents to Enable System Level Runtime Assurance

The lack of automated assurance case validation and automated identification of assurance violations in autonomous vehicles presents significant challenges. Insufficiencies of the validation and assumptions taken at design time necessitate mechanisms to handle violations at runtime. Active supervision of system performance is essential to prevent assurance downtime, mitigate exposed safety risks, and provide actionable feedback. This work introduces the Monitoring Assurance Indicator Validation (MASSIV) framework, which identifies key violation candidates that may lead to incidents. Identification is achieved by accessing assurance case validation fragments at the system level.Backend monitoring provides telemetry metric data from fleet operation, integrating vehicle and component levels and enabling the connection to design processes. The proposed approach leverages safety performance indicators across various system levels to validate design phase assumptions and extend multivariate monitoring at the component level. The core of this approach lies in automating the observation of safety goal threshold parameters, reflecting diverse states of safety performance through calculated graph functions across large-scale systems. A method to assess safety performance in the backend, revealing the anatomy of system insufficiencies and providing potential fleet responses, is proposed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/issrew63542.2024.00053
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.97
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automated Interpretation of Fleet Incidents to Enable System Level Runtime Assurance

Rohlinger Tihomir
2 citations
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
0.97
article

Automated Interpretation of Fleet Incidents to Enable System Level Runtime Assurance

Rohlinger Tihomir
article en
2 citations

Abstract

The lack of automated assurance case validation and automated identification of assurance violations in autonomous vehicles presents significant challenges. Insufficiencies of the validation and assumptions taken at design time necessitate mechanisms to handle violations at runtime. Active supervision of system performance is essential to prevent assurance downtime, mitigate exposed safety risks, and provide actionable feedback. This work introduces the Monitoring Assurance Indicator Validation (MASSIV) framework, which identifies key violation candidates that may lead to incidents. Identification is achieved by accessing assurance case validation fragments at the system level.Backend monitoring provides telemetry metric data from fleet operation, integrating vehicle and component levels and enabling the connection to design processes. The proposed approach leverages safety performance indicators across various system levels to validate design phase assumptions and extend multivariate monitoring at the component level. The core of this approach lies in automating the observation of safety goal threshold parameters, reflecting diverse states of safety performance through calculated graph functions across large-scale systems. A method to assess safety performance in the backend, revealing the anatomy of system insufficiencies and providing potential fleet responses, is proposed.

University of Stuttgart (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
0.97
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Automated Interpretation of Fleet Incidents to Enable System Level Runtime Assurance — Rohlinger Tihomir · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS