SAFE-CARE: Reversible Privacy-preserving Physician Feedback Framework to Improve Patient Care Quality

Current quality improvement efforts in clinical medicine face significant challenges, such as delivering timely performance data to clinicians, lacking relevant benchmarks, and infrequent reference to national guidelines during performance reviews. There is an urgent need to help physicians identify inefficiencies in their practices compared to local, regional, or national peers. However, proposed solutions often meet resistance due to privacy concerns and potential repercussions. To address these issues, we propose SAFE-CARE, a privacy-preserving feedback framework that provides timely performance data while safeguarding physician anonymity. SAFE-CARE employs a cryptography-based threshold secret sharing scheme, allowing for reversible privacy that protects against unauthorized identification while enabling de-anonymization for legitimate purposes, such as audits. This framework facilitates the collection and correlation of data across different clinical repositories within a healthcare system, comparing it to optimal care patterns to assess physician performance and resource use. We demonstrate the feasibility of SAFE-CARE through a prototype validated with synthetic data in a blood transfusion case study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/cyberc62439.2024.00032
Primary Topic
Patient Dignity and Privacy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SAFE-CARE: Reversible Privacy-preserving Physician Feedback Framework to Improve Patient Care Quality

Kellie Simmons-Massey, Gordon H. Morewood, Yanhua Li, Avinash Srinivasan
Patient Dignity and Privacy
article

SAFE-CARE: Reversible Privacy-preserving Physician Feedback Framework to Improve Patient Care Quality

Kellie Simmons-Massey, Gordon H. Morewood, Yanhua Li, Avinash Srinivasan
article en

Abstract

Current quality improvement efforts in clinical medicine face significant challenges, such as delivering timely performance data to clinicians, lacking relevant benchmarks, and infrequent reference to national guidelines during performance reviews. There is an urgent need to help physicians identify inefficiencies in their practices compared to local, regional, or national peers. However, proposed solutions often meet resistance due to privacy concerns and potential repercussions. To address these issues, we propose SAFE-CARE, a privacy-preserving feedback framework that provides timely performance data while safeguarding physician anonymity. SAFE-CARE employs a cryptography-based threshold secret sharing scheme, allowing for reversible privacy that protects against unauthorized identification while enabling de-anonymization for legitimate purposes, such as audits. This framework facilitates the collection and correlation of data across different clinical repositories within a healthcare system, comparing it to optimal care patterns to assess physician performance and resource use. We demonstrate the feasibility of SAFE-CARE through a prototype validated with synthetic data in a blood transfusion case study.

University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US), United States Naval Academy (US), Temple University Hospital (US), Temple University Health System (US), UMass Memorial Medical Center (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Patient Dignity and Privacy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.