Is Humanitarian Aid Funding Fair and Square? Correlating Social Justice to Humanitarian aid Utilisation

The majority of aid funding is directed to international organizations with very little going directly to local actors. This takes decision-making power away from local communities. Yet principles of humanitarian engineering emphasize socially just practices. Failure to consider these principles leads to the design of inappropriate technologies. This study investigates how the highest recipients of aid make decisions, and whether social justice is considered. Financial Tracking Service (FTS) data is analysed to determine which organizations are receiving the most funding. Needs assessment guidelines followed by these organizations are reviewed against a proposed social justice criteria. It has been found that the needs assessment guidelines emphasize participatory rights-based approaches, however, this is not reflected within their step-by-step frameworks. It is recommended to incorporate strategies of capacity sharing, trust building and genuine participation that reflects the criteria for social justice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ghtc62424.2024.10771547
Citations
1
Primary Topic
International Development and Aid
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Is Humanitarian Aid Funding Fair and Square? Correlating Social Justice to Humanitarian aid Utilisation

Alberto Martinetti, Eric Lutters, Nina Trauernicht, Zikambiyani Haanyika
1 citations
International Development and Aid
1.40
article

Is Humanitarian Aid Funding Fair and Square? Correlating Social Justice to Humanitarian aid Utilisation

Alberto Martinetti, Eric Lutters, Nina Trauernicht, Zikambiyani Haanyika
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The majority of aid funding is directed to international organizations with very little going directly to local actors. This takes decision-making power away from local communities. Yet principles of humanitarian engineering emphasize socially just practices. Failure to consider these principles leads to the design of inappropriate technologies. This study investigates how the highest recipients of aid make decisions, and whether social justice is considered. Financial Tracking Service (FTS) data is analysed to determine which organizations are receiving the most funding. Needs assessment guidelines followed by these organizations are reviewed against a proposed social justice criteria. It has been found that the needs assessment guidelines emphasize participatory rights-based approaches, however, this is not reflected within their step-by-step frameworks. It is recommended to incorporate strategies of capacity sharing, trust building and genuine participation that reflects the criteria for social justice.

University of Twente (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
International Development and Aid
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.