Does a Standards-First Infrastructure Design Neglect Community Context?

Engineers acknowledge the necessity of considering the community context for long-lasting, sustainable water infrastructure designs. Contextual Engineering contends that designs cannot simply consider the economic, political, cultural, educational, and mechanical influences of a community but must develop from the local context before any technical decision making. This work-in-progress illustrates the significance that considering international standards before the local context has on a rural community water system design. This research offers an ethical comparison of technical outcomes by directly comparing a contextual engineer's design with the community and a senior engineering team's design consulting to the community through an organizational proxy. Preliminary results illustrate that not only are the design outcomes significantly different in components, the standards-first team could not adequately adjust their designs to consider the long-term maintenance and local constraints of the project.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/ghtc62424.2024.10771569
Primary Topic
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does a Standards-First Infrastructure Design Neglect Community Context?

Ann‐Perry Witmer, Emily Lawson-Bulten
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
article

Does a Standards-First Infrastructure Design Neglect Community Context?

Ann‐Perry Witmer, Emily Lawson-Bulten
article en

Abstract

Engineers acknowledge the necessity of considering the community context for long-lasting, sustainable water infrastructure designs. Contextual Engineering contends that designs cannot simply consider the economic, political, cultural, educational, and mechanical influences of a community but must develop from the local context before any technical decision making. This work-in-progress illustrates the significance that considering international standards before the local context has on a rural community water system design. This research offers an ethical comparison of technical outcomes by directly comparing a contextual engineer's design with the community and a senior engineering team's design consulting to the community through an organizational proxy. Preliminary results illustrate that not only are the design outcomes significantly different in components, the standards-first team could not adequately adjust their designs to consider the long-term maintenance and local constraints of the project.

University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Urban and Rural Development Challenges
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.