Failing and Learning: A Study of What is Learned About Reliability From Software Incidents

Many organizations have defined processes for learning from failure, often involving postmortem analyses conducted after any system failures that are judged to be sufficiently severe. The output from such a postmortem is an incident report that describes in detail the failure and what was learned about the failure through the postmortem process. To better understand what is learned about the reliability of systems from failures, we have conducted a qualitative analysis of 89 failures (documented in 70 incident reports), with a particular focus on what is learned about the role of people, such as designers, operators and incident responders. Based on our analysis, this paper reports on insights related to three reliability topics: (1) the events that trigger incidents, (2) the contributing factors (sometimes called root causes) of incidents, and (3) the recovery from failures. Our results provide insights into the contributions people make toward system reliability, the challenges they face, and also how a failure-driven learning process informs people’s work.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/issrew63542.2024.00093
Primary Topic
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failing and Learning: A Study of What is Learned About Reliability From Software Incidents

Jonathan Sillito, M.H. Pope
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
article

Failing and Learning: A Study of What is Learned About Reliability From Software Incidents

Jonathan Sillito, M.H. Pope
article en

Abstract

Many organizations have defined processes for learning from failure, often involving postmortem analyses conducted after any system failures that are judged to be sufficiently severe. The output from such a postmortem is an incident report that describes in detail the failure and what was learned about the failure through the postmortem process. To better understand what is learned about the reliability of systems from failures, we have conducted a qualitative analysis of 89 failures (documented in 70 incident reports), with a particular focus on what is learned about the role of people, such as designers, operators and incident responders. Based on our analysis, this paper reports on insights related to three reliability topics: (1) the events that trigger incidents, (2) the contributing factors (sometimes called root causes) of incidents, and (3) the recovery from failures. Our results provide insights into the contributions people make toward system reliability, the challenges they face, and also how a failure-driven learning process informs people’s work.

Brigham Young University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Software Reliability and Analysis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.