"The Faroe Islands handle this themselves”: The convergence of bodily and national autonomy in abortion rights discussions

Faroese abortion legislation is subject to CEDAW’s (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women) regular reports and has in the last two decades faced criticism for its failure to secure sufficient abortion rights. In this article we analyse international deliberation of the Faroese abortion legislation, where national autonomy as an ideal seemingly outweighs the right to bodily autonomy as a human right. Conducting a concept-oriented critique of how abortion rights are discussed in the convergence of these discourses of autonomy, we emphasise the limitations of arguing for bodily autonomy in relation to abortion rights as a human right. But we also argue that the rhetorical performance of statehood should be scrutinised when it reflects a problematic conception of the right to self-government where national statehood trumps reproductive citizenship. Rather than deliberating the circumstances under which reproductive rights are managed in the Faroe Islands, international attention to the Faroese case becomes an opportunity to underscore that “the Faroe Islands handle this themselves". This article sheds light on both the foundation underpinning a human rights perspective on abortion rights and on the Faroese situation. Úrtak Viðkomandi føroysk viðurskifti vera viðgjørd í frágreiðingunum hjá CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women) um danska kongaríkið og føroyska abortlóggávan hevur sostatt seinastu tvey áratíggjuni fingið ábreiðslu fyri ikki at tryggja abortrættindi í nøktandi mun. Í hesi grein greina vit altjóða viðgerðina av føroysku abortlóggávuni og hvussu tjóðskaparligt sjálvræði sum ideal verður sett hægri enn kropsligt sjálvræði sum menniskjarættindi. Gjøgnum eina hugtakslýsing av hvussu abort verður viðgjørt í hesi samanrenning av sjálvræðisdiskursum, leggja vit dent á hvørjar avmarkingar eru í samband við at grundgeva fyri nær abortrættindi eru menniskjarættindi. Men grundgivið verður eisini fyri hvussu retoriska framførslan av fullveldisstøðu Føroya vísir eina ivingarsama fatan av rættinum til sjálvstýri har tjóðskaparligt sjálvræåi vinnur á reproduktivum medborgaraskapi: heldur enn at viðgera hvussu reproduktiv rættindi verða tryggjað í Føroyum, so verða altjóða ábreiðslur nýttar sum høvi at undirstrika at “Føroyar taka sær av hesum sjálvar”. Sostatt lýsir greinin bæði grundarlagið undir menniskjarættindaatlitum til abort umframt føroysku støðuna.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fróðskaparrit - Faroese Scientific Journal
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18602/v77s2p84
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

"The Faroe Islands handle this themselves”: The convergence of bodily and national autonomy in abortion rights discussions

Turið Hermannsdóttir, Turið Nolsøe
1 links
Fróðskaparrit - Faroese Scientific Journal
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

"The Faroe Islands handle this themselves”: The convergence of bodily and national autonomy in abortion rights discussions

Turið Hermannsdóttir, Turið Nolsøe
article en

Abstract

Faroese abortion legislation is subject to CEDAW’s (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women) regular reports and has in the last two decades faced criticism for its failure to secure sufficient abortion rights. In this article we analyse international deliberation of the Faroese abortion legislation, where national autonomy as an ideal seemingly outweighs the right to bodily autonomy as a human right. Conducting a concept-oriented critique of how abortion rights are discussed in the convergence of these discourses of autonomy, we emphasise the limitations of arguing for bodily autonomy in relation to abortion rights as a human right. But we also argue that the rhetorical performance of statehood should be scrutinised when it reflects a problematic conception of the right to self-government where national statehood trumps reproductive citizenship. Rather than deliberating the circumstances under which reproductive rights are managed in the Faroe Islands, international attention to the Faroese case becomes an opportunity to underscore that “the Faroe Islands handle this themselves". This article sheds light on both the foundation underpinning a human rights perspective on abortion rights and on the Faroese situation. Úrtak Viðkomandi føroysk viðurskifti vera viðgjørd í frágreiðingunum hjá CEDAW (Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women) um danska kongaríkið og føroyska abortlóggávan hevur sostatt seinastu tvey áratíggjuni fingið ábreiðslu fyri ikki at tryggja abortrættindi í nøktandi mun. Í hesi grein greina vit altjóða viðgerðina av føroysku abortlóggávuni og hvussu tjóðskaparligt sjálvræði sum ideal verður sett hægri enn kropsligt sjálvræði sum menniskjarættindi. Gjøgnum eina hugtakslýsing av hvussu abort verður viðgjørt í hesi samanrenning av sjálvræðisdiskursum, leggja vit dent á hvørjar avmarkingar eru í samband við at grundgeva fyri nær abortrættindi eru menniskjarættindi. Men grundgivið verður eisini fyri hvussu retoriska framførslan av fullveldisstøðu Føroya vísir eina ivingarsama fatan av rættinum til sjálvstýri har tjóðskaparligt sjálvræåi vinnur á reproduktivum medborgaraskapi: heldur enn at viðgera hvussu reproduktiv rættindi verða tryggjað í Føroyum, so verða altjóða ábreiðslur nýttar sum høvi at undirstrika at “Føroyar taka sær av hesum sjálvar”. Sostatt lýsir greinin bæði grundarlagið undir menniskjarættindaatlitum til abort umframt føroysku støðuna.

Fróðskaparrit - Faroese Scientific Journal
Aarhus University (DK)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.