Correction to: “Ω-results for Beurling's zeta function and lower bounds for the generalised Dirichlet divisor problem” [J. Number Theory 130 (2010) 707–715]

We discuss the main result of [1] which is concerned with the study of generalised prime systems for which the integer counting function N P ( x ) is asymptotically very well-behaved, in the sense that N P ( x ) = ρ x + O ( x β ) , where ρ is a positive constant and β < 1 2 . For such systems, the associated zeta function ζ P ( s ) is holomorphic for σ = ℜ s > β . It was claimed that for β < σ < 1 2 , ∫ 0 T | ζ P ( σ + i t ) | 2 d t = Ω ( T 2 − 2 σ − ε ) for (i) any ε > 0 , and (ii) for ε = 0 for all such σ except possibly one value. The proof of these statements contains a flaw however, and in this Corrigendum we indicate where the mistake occurred but show that the proof can be rectified to still obtain (i) and get a slightly weaker result for (ii). The resulting Corollary 2 of [1] concerning the Dirichlet divisor problem for generalised integers remains essentially correct.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Number Theory
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnt.2024.09.010
Primary Topic
Mathematics and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correction to: “Ω-results for Beurling's zeta function and lower bounds for the generalised Dirichlet divisor problem” [J. Number Theory 130 (2010) 707–715]

Titus Hilberdink
Journal of Number Theory
Mathematics and Applications
article

Correction to: “Ω-results for Beurling's zeta function and lower bounds for the generalised Dirichlet divisor problem” [J. Number Theory 130 (2010) 707–715]

Titus Hilberdink
article en

Abstract

We discuss the main result of [1] which is concerned with the study of generalised prime systems for which the integer counting function N P ( x ) is asymptotically very well-behaved, in the sense that N P ( x ) = ρ x + O ( x β ) , where ρ is a positive constant and β < 1 2 . For such systems, the associated zeta function ζ P ( s ) is holomorphic for σ = ℜ s > β . It was claimed that for β < σ < 1 2 , ∫ 0 T | ζ P ( σ + i t ) | 2 d t = Ω ( T 2 − 2 σ − ε ) for (i) any ε > 0 , and (ii) for ε = 0 for all such σ except possibly one value. The proof of these statements contains a flaw however, and in this Corrigendum we indicate where the mistake occurred but show that the proof can be rectified to still obtain (i) and get a slightly weaker result for (ii). The resulting Corollary 2 of [1] concerning the Dirichlet divisor problem for generalised integers remains essentially correct.

Journal of Number TheoryVol. 269
Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Mathematics and Applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.