Doing things with grammar

Abstract This paper studies the way utterances project properties of the interactional context via the choice of grammatical indexicals. Our analysis is an original combination of existing theoretical developments including notions of grammatical indexicality ( Silverstein 1976 ), of the relational structure of indexical reference ( Hanks 2014 ) and of presupposition accommodation (von Fintel 2008 ; Heim 1982 ; Karttunen 1974 , among others). While Silverstein (1976) suggested that different types of grammatical indexicals can be (relatively) context-creating or (relatively) context-presupposing, we argue that presupposition vs creativity is not a property of specific categories, but rather of tokens in a given context and that in natural interaction, they are subject to negotiation. While all indexicals are presupposing, there are two types of uses of pragmatic presupposition involved forming a scale ( Mazzarella & Domaneschi 2018 ; Sbisà 1999 ): non-informative (when the presupposition is already part of common ground of the interlocutors) and informative (when the presupposition needs to be accommodated by the addressee). The theoretical analysis is grounded in a discussion of data on evidentiality, egophoricity, pronouns of address, demonstrative reference, and tense and is based on literature review, as well as first-hand recordings of conversations in Wutun (mixed Sinitic language, China) and Mano (Mande, Guinea).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Functions of Language
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.23032.kha
Primary Topic
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Doing things with grammar

Maria Khachaturyan, Thera Marie Crane, Erika Sandman
Functions of Language
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
article

Doing things with grammar

Maria Khachaturyan, Thera Marie Crane, Erika Sandman
article en

Abstract

Abstract This paper studies the way utterances project properties of the interactional context via the choice of grammatical indexicals. Our analysis is an original combination of existing theoretical developments including notions of grammatical indexicality ( Silverstein 1976 ), of the relational structure of indexical reference ( Hanks 2014 ) and of presupposition accommodation (von Fintel 2008 ; Heim 1982 ; Karttunen 1974 , among others). While Silverstein (1976) suggested that different types of grammatical indexicals can be (relatively) context-creating or (relatively) context-presupposing, we argue that presupposition vs creativity is not a property of specific categories, but rather of tokens in a given context and that in natural interaction, they are subject to negotiation. While all indexicals are presupposing, there are two types of uses of pragmatic presupposition involved forming a scale ( Mazzarella & Domaneschi 2018 ; Sbisà 1999 ): non-informative (when the presupposition is already part of common ground of the interlocutors) and informative (when the presupposition needs to be accommodated by the addressee). The theoretical analysis is grounded in a discussion of data on evidentiality, egophoricity, pronouns of address, demonstrative reference, and tense and is based on literature review, as well as first-hand recordings of conversations in Wutun (mixed Sinitic language, China) and Mano (Mande, Guinea).

Functions of LanguageVol. 31(2)
University of Helsinki (FI), Swedish Collegium for Advanced Study (SE), University of Pretoria (ZA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.