Stability of noise annoyance

Noise has been shown to have negative health consequences and studies have linked these consequences in part to the subjective annoyance caused by the noise. Subjective noise annoyance is often measured using a 11-point numeric scale (e.g. annoyance scale in ISO 15666:2021 previously ISO/TS 15666:2003). Thereby the mean annoyance rating of a group of participants is commonly used as the default measure of the annoyance induced by a specific sound. However, the quality of these annoyance measures (which were developed only for the use in field studies) in terms of stability in a controlled laboratory setting has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the current study was therefore to evaluate the between- and within participant stability of noise annoyance, as well as the stability of the mean annoyance within a group of participants and between two groups of participants as well as between different experimental settings. The results revealed a low between- and a low within participant stability, but a high stability of the mean annoyance. The general sound context (other sounds included in the experiment) had an influence on the noise annoyance ratings. The results were used to develop a mathematical model of noise annoyance. According to this model, the mean annoyance is not the measure of central tendency of the tested group but the cleaned annoyance. The cleaned annoyance is thereby not an estimate of the actual annoyance a person is expected to experience in relation to a certain sound. It is rather a measure of the part of noise annoyance that is explained by the acoustical properties and the sound context. Our model can explain the results from the current study as well as results from previous studies. Recommendations are made concerning the evaluation of noise annoyance in laboratory studies and future development of the mathematical model. • Noise annoyance measures show a low within-participant and a low between-participant stability. • The mean annoyance rating of a group of participants for a specific sound shows a high stability. • The mean annoyance does not represent the measure of central tendency but the ‘cleaned annoyance’. • The cleaned annoyance is determined by the acoustical properties and the sound context. • A mathematical model is used to formulize theoretical assumption about noise annoyance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Applied Acoustics
Published
2024-12-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apacoust.2024.110443
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Noise Effects and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.87
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Stability of noise annoyance

Michaela Socher, Noemi Herget, Maria Zaglauer, Till Sumalvico et al.
1 citations
Applied Acoustics
Noise Effects and Management
0.87
article

Stability of noise annoyance

Michaela Socher, Noemi Herget, Maria Zaglauer, Till Sumalvico, Dzenan Babajic
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Noise has been shown to have negative health consequences and studies have linked these consequences in part to the subjective annoyance caused by the noise. Subjective noise annoyance is often measured using a 11-point numeric scale (e.g. annoyance scale in ISO 15666:2021 previously ISO/TS 15666:2003). Thereby the mean annoyance rating of a group of participants is commonly used as the default measure of the annoyance induced by a specific sound. However, the quality of these annoyance measures (which were developed only for the use in field studies) in terms of stability in a controlled laboratory setting has not been evaluated yet. The aim of the current study was therefore to evaluate the between- and within participant stability of noise annoyance, as well as the stability of the mean annoyance within a group of participants and between two groups of participants as well as between different experimental settings. The results revealed a low between- and a low within participant stability, but a high stability of the mean annoyance. The general sound context (other sounds included in the experiment) had an influence on the noise annoyance ratings. The results were used to develop a mathematical model of noise annoyance. According to this model, the mean annoyance is not the measure of central tendency of the tested group but the cleaned annoyance. The cleaned annoyance is thereby not an estimate of the actual annoyance a person is expected to experience in relation to a certain sound. It is rather a measure of the part of noise annoyance that is explained by the acoustical properties and the sound context. Our model can explain the results from the current study as well as results from previous studies. Recommendations are made concerning the evaluation of noise annoyance in laboratory studies and future development of the mathematical model. • Noise annoyance measures show a low within-participant and a low between-participant stability. • The mean annoyance rating of a group of participants for a specific sound shows a high stability. • The mean annoyance does not represent the measure of central tendency but the ‘cleaned annoyance’. • The cleaned annoyance is determined by the acoustical properties and the sound context. • A mathematical model is used to formulize theoretical assumption about noise annoyance.

Applied AcousticsVol. 231
Fraunhofer Information Center for Planning and Building (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Building Physics (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Noise Effects and Management
0.87
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.