Upcoding Linked To Up To Two-Thirds Of Growth In Highest-Intensity Hospital Discharges In 5 States, 2011–19

Diagnosis-based payment systems can create incentives to upcode patients to a higher level of severity to increase payment. In some instances, upcoding can be a form of fraud if providers code patients to a higher complexity than is appropriate, whereas in other instances, upcoding can accurately reflect patient acuity. We estimated the increase in Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) upcoding during the period 2011-19, using all-payer discharge-level data from five states. During this period, the number of discharges with the highest MS-DRG coding intensity increased by 41 percent. Adjusting for changes in patient characteristics, length-of-stay, and hospital characteristics, we estimated that the increase would have been 13 percent in the absence of changes in coding behavior. We estimated that in 2019, the increase in upcoding (relative to 2011 coding practices) was associated with $14.6 billion in hospital payments, including $5.8 billion from private health plans, $4.6 billion from Medicare, and $1.8 billion from Medicaid. These findings can contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the design of payment models that limit distortions in payment and resource allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health Affairs
Published
2024-12-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.00596
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.29
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Upcoding Linked To Up To Two-Thirds Of Growth In Highest-Intensity Hospital Discharges In 5 States, 2011–19

Christopher Whaley, Teague Ruder, Michael Dworsky, Jonathan Levin et al.
12 citations
Health Affairs
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
8.29
article

Upcoding Linked To Up To Two-Thirds Of Growth In Highest-Intensity Hospital Discharges In 5 States, 2011–19

Christopher Whaley, Teague Ruder, Michael Dworsky, Jonathan Levin, Daniel Crespin
article en
12 citations

Abstract

Diagnosis-based payment systems can create incentives to upcode patients to a higher level of severity to increase payment. In some instances, upcoding can be a form of fraud if providers code patients to a higher complexity than is appropriate, whereas in other instances, upcoding can accurately reflect patient acuity. We estimated the increase in Medicare Severity Diagnosis-Related Group (MS-DRG) upcoding during the period 2011-19, using all-payer discharge-level data from five states. During this period, the number of discharges with the highest MS-DRG coding intensity increased by 41 percent. Adjusting for changes in patient characteristics, length-of-stay, and hospital characteristics, we estimated that the increase would have been 13 percent in the absence of changes in coding behavior. We estimated that in 2019, the increase in upcoding (relative to 2011 coding practices) was associated with $14.6 billion in hospital payments, including $5.8 billion from private health plans, $4.6 billion from Medicare, and $1.8 billion from Medicaid. These findings can contribute to the growing body of evidence supporting the design of payment models that limit distortions in payment and resource allocation.

Health AffairsVol. 43(12)
RAND Corporation (US), Brown University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
8.29
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.